<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Madonna and porn]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Swept Away</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>smbozworth</strong> — <em>15 years ago(February 11, 2011 09:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This may have been salvagable if she were not in it. She can't sing and can't act. Why is she in show business? Oh yes. She is easy on the eyes and has nice ears. This movie should be filed under the why bother section of Netflix. I still think M missed her true calling. Porn<br />
"That's a Smith &amp; Wesson and you've had your six." 007 James Bond in <a href="http://Dr.No" rel="nofollow ugc">Dr.No</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/235407/madonna-and-porn</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 04:23:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/235407.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 23:49:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Madonna and porn on Sun, 03 May 2026 23:49:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>chase61-1</strong> — <em>15 years ago(February 16, 2011 05:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If you think she's easy on the eyes then you need yours checked !!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1970431</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1970431</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 23:49:45 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>