<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — I Need To Know</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Bellator86</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 03, 2017 05:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Increasingly, IMDb customers have migrated to IMDb's social media accounts as the primary place they choose to post comments and communicate with IMDb's editors and one another. IMDb's Facebook page (<a href="https://www.facebook.com/imdb" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.facebook.com/imdb</a>) and official Twitter account (<a href="https://twitter.com/imdb" rel="nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/imdb</a>) have an audience of more than 10 million engaged fans.<br />
Did whoever wrote this actually believe in what they were writing? I don't believe for a second that Facebook and Twitter(???) have become "the primary place they choose to post comments and communicate with IMDb's editors and one another" in the way that the IMDb boards have been used for, what, 18 years?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/2358/question-regarding-the-important-message-boards-statement</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 11:26:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/2358.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:46 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>star-core</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 07, 2017 08:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Facebook and Twitter can go to hell as far as I'm concerned. The rot started when IMDb moved the help board to the corporate GetSatisfaction site (Logged into via corporate internet giant Facebook, a company that is big enough to dictate to governments on how much tax they are willing to pay). I come to IMDb to read and interact here, not via any other site. Maybe having a conversation is going out of fashion now, a lot of us must be outmoded, posting pictures of a cup of coffee with "Yum Yum!" written under it, is considered intellectual stimulation nowadays. I have no interest in social media sites, but they seem to be taking over the internet and money talks. I'm 46 so allowed to be an old curmudgeon!<br />
You never backed away from anything in your life! Now fight!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15516</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15516</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jean-Luc_34</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 07, 2017 06:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It doesn't matter how many "followers" they have on FB or Twitter.  People can't have a real discussion on either the way they can here.  If Needham and crew believed that, they're delusional.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15515</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15515</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>feakes</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 04, 2017 01:21 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">they did a update on the boards a few years ago and shut them down for a few days. I wonder what the reason is for shutting it down is it money ?<br />
FIVE TO ONE BABY ONE IN FIVE NO ONE HERE GETS OUT ALIVE - JIM MORRISON</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15514</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15514</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dt123</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 03, 2017 11:59 PM)</em></p>
<h2>And yet it's the most user-friendly,organized discussion boards out there. SO sad.</h2>
<p dir="auto">"Don't<br />
make<br />
me kill you again."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15513</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15513</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prelude-in-C-maj</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 07, 2017 07:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">by Down_South<br />
» 1 hour ago (Tue Feb 7 2017 18:06:58)<br />
IMDb member since July 2008<br />
Actually that is not the reason.<br />
Censorship is the reason.<br />
There is a blacklist on free speech and taking away avenues of speech are a way of narrowing it down.<br />
Know what I mean?<br />
^^^ This.<br />
Plus the fact that there's a general push internet-wide toward making people either have a presence on Facebook and Twitter and directly deal on there, or have to log into somewhere else<br />
via<br />
Facebook or Twitter, otherwise you can't communicate or participate.<br />
The reasons are a mixed bag of both understandable factors, and on the other hand some sinister ones.<br />
I'm not even one of those conspiracy theory people, but even I think the directions things are going are shady.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15512</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15512</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Down_South</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 07, 2017 06:06 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Actually that is not the reason.<br />
Censorship is the reason.<br />
There is a blacklist on free speech and taking away avenues of speech are a way of narrowing it down.<br />
Know what I mean?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15511</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15511</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jill-McBain</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 03, 2017 05:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Money is the internal reason.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000040/thread/264681264" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000040/thread/264681264</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15510</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15510</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>peeaecee</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 03, 2017 05:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm thinking they do have other internal reasons for this, although I don't think they're necessarily shady.  The fact that the board system is older and dated technology has been brought up, and they have a point there, although in this case, surely they could take them down temporarily to update them.  Not that simple, I know, but in essence, practical.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15509</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15509</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sirtj228</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 04, 2017 01:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It should send a message how sketchy this all sounds.<br />
Directing people to twitter and Facebook was the nail in the coffin<br />
I would never be a part of that</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15508</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15508</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Question regarding the IMPORTANT message boards statement: on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jill-McBain</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 03, 2017 05:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't believe it. I am not on Facebook, however, I checked Pinterest: 75 000 followers and Twitter is even worse. They tweet scenes from, what they believe to be a popular movie with a sensational post and that's it. There is no discussion taking place.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000040/thread/264681264" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000040/thread/264681264</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15507</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/15507</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 04:08:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>