<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Old School</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>disco-spider</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 03, 2010 02:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I loved this when I first saw it in 2003 but after repeat viewing I realized it's not the comedy great I first thought. Notice how the only good parts are when Ferrell is on the screen ("bring your green hat", dust in the wind, etc). No one else is funny, which makes it very imbalanced, and even worse, the other characters are boring. Luke Wilson and Vince Vaughn (ear muffs??) deserved a much better script because they're very good elsewhere. The whole Luke Wilson romantic angle is so forced and has very poor development. I thought Jeremy Piven was wasted as well. And the two smokin hot wives needed to have bigger roles. Leah Remini can be very funny as seen on King of Queens and the other wife simply got a random BJ lesson that didn't go anywhere.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/235827/hasn-t-stood-the-test-of-time</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:23:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/235827.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:55:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TwoThousandOneMark</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 17, 2016 11:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think it's ebbed from &amp; flowed nicely back up to greatness.  Any film around '09-'04 which<br />
just<br />
missed the social media/iPhone era suffered for a bit now it's a classic charm.<br />
Lost in Translation is one I think about like that.  Sure they have cell phones, but walking around Tokyo no one is face down texting/gaming on mobiles.  Like sci-fi now.<br />
top 50 <a href="http://www.imdb.com/list/ls056413299/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/list/ls056413299/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973850</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973850</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>datorcato1000</strong> — <em>12 years ago(October 28, 2013 01:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Old School is a great movie. I didn't see it around the time it came out because I was pretty young, but I've seen it at least 10 times and it never gets old. I think people have forgotten about it because of other movies these guys have been in (Dodgeball, Wedding Crashers, Anchorman, Talladega Nights, etc) and the fact that Todd Phillips directed the Hangover. Aside of Wedding Crashers, I don't think any o the movies I listed are as good as Old School.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973849</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973849</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bkbirge</strong> — <em>12 years ago(August 06, 2013 04:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just watched it again, I still think it's a classic. So many good lines. The romantic subplot does seem just as forced as when I first saw it 10 years ago but the rest of it is pure gold. Will F has his breakout role here and actually brings pathos to his character which just makes it all the more funny when he goes off the rails.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973848</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973848</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TwoThousandOneMark</strong> — <em>12 years ago(August 05, 2013 03:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">While it hasn't stood its test of time as a comedic legend, I do appreciate its story arcs a lot more- with the comedic dreck Hollywood has been serving up lately.<br />
Old School was pretty groundbreaking imo, before Apatow's stretch of blockbusters, this movie reset the comedic bar for mod coms.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973847</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973847</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Flabrezu</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 10, 2013 01:52 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">None of this movie at all funny, and if 7 years is "the test of time," then that is pretty damn bad.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973846</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973846</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>venturaa</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 09, 2013 07:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This whole movie is good parts!<br />
Snakes. Why'd it have to be snakes?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973845</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973845</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Shan2133</strong> — <em>13 years ago(May 22, 2012 11:50 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">When this movie came out I was in college. My friends and I watched thisor I'll say, had it playing in the background everyday while we chilled out and played spades. We knew all the words and it remained funny as hell. I just watched this the other day with my boyfriend and I laughed just as hard.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973844</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973844</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973843</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973843</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jasonstickets</strong> — <em>15 years ago(April 03, 2011 07:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yea if you are you're friends are still quoting a movie over 7 years later then its def time for you guys to start trying to get laid. Frankly the reason yall aren't getting laid is for in part quoting random movies to girls.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973842</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973842</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>purplehelmets</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 21, 2011 10:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">great movie op is wrong</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973841</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973841</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Evertts3</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 15, 2011 08:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just watched it the other night; un-cut.  Still holds up extremely well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>AStreetwalkingCheetah</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 06, 2011 02:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Maybe it seems a little forced,but it's not a romantic comedy,that relationship is a sub <a href="http://plot.It" rel="nofollow ugc">plot.It</a>'s more a comedy about some thirty something's trying to recapture the joys of their not so distant past.That's what's great about it,all these college or high school movies focus on how great it is to be a teen or in your early twenties,but when you hit a set age the fun should stop and everything is supposed to get serious.These guys weren't ready to do that yet,especially Frank.The relationship with Wilson's character was a bit light,sure,generic bad boyfriend competition and all,but it's secondary to the comedy and just there to give his character a happy ending.Hell,even Andy Dick is funny-ish in it,and a movie that can make that guy make me laugh is doing well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973839</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973839</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>captkirk_4</strong> — <em>15 years ago(December 12, 2010 02:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The whole Luke Wilson romantic angle is so forced and has very poor development.<br />
I agree on that one, I didn't see why that chick (with some other guys kid no less) was so attractive to him. I thought the first chick he woke up with at the party was a lot hotter, even his "gang bang" girlfriend was a more interesting character. That said I laughed a lot during this movie, it was pretty funny. While not being exactly the paragon of cinema, Todd Phillip's crude movies are usually quite enjoyable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973838</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973838</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tccavey3</strong> — <em>15 years ago(November 26, 2010 09:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wow really people? I watched this yesterday with my buddies and as usual, we were laughing our asses off. Vaughn, Wilson, Ferrell, and even Piven all had classic lines. How could you not laugh at the van-abduction scene?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973837</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973837</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sstack-3</strong> — <em>15 years ago(November 23, 2010 01:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I saw it for the first time about 3 or 4 months ago and kind of felt lukewarm about it.  Maybe because everyone had been hyping it for so many years for me.  But I've watched it 2 or 3 times since then and actually have enjoyed it more each time.  Ferrell is a little over the top (well, I guess not compared to some of his later films), but has some of the funniest lines in the movie.  It's not as good as The Hangover in my opinion, but it has definitely grown on me.  I agree, however, that the whole test thing drags at the end.  It's kind of like the parade scene in Animal House (which is my all time favorite in this genre).</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973836</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973836</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Haverchuck_Is_King</strong> — <em>15 years ago(November 21, 2010 08:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think it is still very good, but whenever I watch it now I usually turn it off after Blue's funeral. The movie is hilarious up until that point. I think Jeremy Piven was miscast in this, and the whole plot involving the fraternity being subjected to tests is labored.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973835</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973835</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>avo99</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 22, 2010 03:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">just watched it for the first time and i have to agree with OP, ferrell is the only funny person in this.<br />
how can this movie have the same imdb-rating as the masterpiece that is "anchorman"? don't get me wrong, i didn't hate it, but it's not better than 5/10 or 6/10 for me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973834</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973834</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>joshphilliard</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 14, 2010 01:50 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It is cliche, the story is overly familiar and some of the characters are stock. And except for Will Ferrell(who I'm pretty sure imporvised his lines), they underutilized a very talented and quality cast.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973833</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973833</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973832</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973832</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>techbox14</strong> — <em>15 years ago(June 21, 2010 02:36 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agree with OP.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973831</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973831</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Paul_Ke</strong> — <em>15 years ago(May 30, 2010 11:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This movie is just as funny to me as it was in 2003.  What with the "ear muffs??" diss?  The earmuffs thing was, and still is, funny.  Old School is a timeless comedy classic.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973830</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973830</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>meecrofilm</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 13, 2010 09:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Disagree.  Watching it right now on a movie channel and it's as funny as ever, if not moreso in light of recent comic fodder around in theatres.  Definitely my favorite Phillips movie, and one of my favorite comedies of all time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973829</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973829</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:56:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:55:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973828</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973828</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:55:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hasn&#x27;t stood the test of time on Mon, 04 May 2026 00:55:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CapMaster</strong> — <em>16 years ago(March 08, 2010 07:35 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">After watching this last night for the first time in a while,this movie does indeed stil hold up as an all-time classic. Also, think about the people who were in this. Ferrell, Vaughn, Jeremy Piven, Ellen Pompeo, Perrey ReevesAll blew up after his movie. I only wish that some of the deleted scenes or made for TV scenes were included just to fresh out the story more.<br />
By made for TV, I mean scenes that seem to be added in on cable/edited viewings to make up for time cut from the stuff networks won't show.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973827</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1973827</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:55:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>