<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Top 250 TV: #16, plus a rating of 9.1&#x2F;10 on IMDb with nearly 200,000 votes so far,]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Firefly</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>computer2computer</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 11, 2017 06:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Top 250 TV: #16, plus a rating of 9.1/10 on IMDb with nearly 200,000 votes so far,<br />
yet somehow,<br />
some retard was able to justify cancelling this VERY successful TV series to his even dumber bosses!<br />
HOW?!!!<br />
To resist the influence of others, knowledge of one's self is most important</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/235925/top-250-tv-16-plus-a-rating-of-9-1-10-on-imdb-with-nearly-200-000-votes-so-far</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 11:50:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/235925.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 01:18:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Top 250 TV: #16, plus a rating of 9.1&#x2F;10 on IMDb with nearly 200,000 votes so far, on Mon, 04 May 2026 01:18:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chocolope</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 06, 2017 01:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's more successful now than it was when it first aired. Fox made a number of mistakes like airing the wrong episode first and putting it in a "death slot" for ratings. Sadly a lot of really great shows go out this way.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1974999</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1974999</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 01:18:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Top 250 TV: #16, plus a rating of 9.1&#x2F;10 on IMDb with nearly 200,000 votes so far, on Mon, 04 May 2026 01:18:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>eliotno3-767-409424</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 04, 2017 10:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You had me at Fox. Enough said.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1974998</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1974998</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 01:18:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Top 250 TV: #16, plus a rating of 9.1&#x2F;10 on IMDb with nearly 200,000 votes so far, on Mon, 04 May 2026 01:18:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>skoobydoo6789</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 11, 2017 07:48 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, the problem was that Fox didn't advertise the show correctly and also aired the episodes out of order and on Fridays. Then, they cancelled it with three unaired episodes.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1974997</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1974997</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 01:18:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Top 250 TV: #16, plus a rating of 9.1&#x2F;10 on IMDb with nearly 200,000 votes so far, on Mon, 04 May 2026 01:18:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>preachcaleb</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 11, 2017 07:21 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, the show was expensive to make and didn't bring in much ratings. That's pretty much how.<br />
Seize the moment, 'cause tomorrow you might be dead.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1974996</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1974996</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 01:18:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>