<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Cover]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Claustrophobia</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>NorthSoul</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 27, 2010 01:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I see that a lot of people comment on the fact that the DVD cover was misleading On the version I got there was just a knife with some blood on it, and the title was "Claustrophobia". To tell you the truth, it looked kinda like a VERY bad low-budget movie, so I watched it expecting it to be REALLy bad.<br />
Maybe thats why I didnt hate the movie. I actually liked it.<br />
If you have a problem with the movie because of the cover, I think you should blame the people marketing the movie as something other than it is, not the director, who did a decent job with limited funds.<br />
Watch the movie again, expecting it to be as bad as you remember. Maybe youll be surprised.<br />
But, thats just my opinion - and you DO have the right to yours.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/236318/the-cover</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:12:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/236318.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 02:18:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>