<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[could have been so much better with the skin contrast between Grace &amp; Timothy &amp; considering it was sort of long with alo]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Manderlay</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>justafu</strong> — <em>18 years ago(December 19, 2007 03:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">could have been so much better with the skin contrast between Grace &amp; Timothy &amp; considering it was sort of long with alot of nudity but hey I guess it had to "fit" the theme of the moviewhatever that was.<br />
"It is well that war is so terrible  lest we should grow too fond of it."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/237215/could-have-been-so-much-better-with-the-skin-contrast-between-grace-timothy-considering-it-was-sort-of-long-with-alo</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 10:11:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/237215.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 04:53:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to could have been so much better with the skin contrast between Grace &amp; Timothy &amp; considering it was sort of long with alo on Mon, 04 May 2026 04:53:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Mhjm6</strong> — <em>12 years ago(October 05, 2013 01:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Bryce Dallas Howard getting undressed is literally the only interesting part of this otherwise waste of time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1985914</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1985914</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 04:53:16 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>