<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[To Superman 1&amp;2]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Superman Returns</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>MickyMac</strong> — <em>4 months ago(November 22, 2025 03:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">To Superman 1&amp;2<br />
Continuity was all over the place in Superman Returns, it was unclear if it was a sequel to Superman 1&amp;2 or a reboot of the Donnerverse, characters and locations are redesigned to the point where they feel disconnected from the universe being continued.<br />
Like Jor El was just a recording not an AI, The Daily Planet is more art deco and nothing like 78.<br />
The redesigned suit feels like a different version of Superman that isn't Christopher Reeve.<br />
Superman Returns feels like Superman 2 never happened, Jor El in Returns was just a recording not an AI mentor so how did Superman lose and get back his powers?<br />
The film wanted to be a sequel and wants to be a reboot but never picks a side.<br />
The film wanted to reimagine Superman and Lois as a tragic love story, it could've worked but here it drains the characters of any momentum.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/237257/to-superman-1-2</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:48:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/237257.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 04:59:59 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>