<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Original 1950 version much better]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cheaper by the Dozen</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>D_Ray_Morton</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 08, 2015 08:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Today's problem  remaking classics  always leaving the viewer feeling ripped off  I like Steve Martin a lot  especially The Jerk and Dead Men Don't wear plaid  but Clifton Webb and Myrna Loy are irreplaceable</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/237569/original-1950-version-much-better</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:19:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/237569.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Original 1950 version much better on Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MissMellieY</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 29, 2016 11:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">To me, it wasn't even THAT.  They basically gave Gilbreth and Carey credit for the TITLE.  The only thing the same was that there were 12 children. The Gilbreth parents (in the original) were REAL people who were pioneers in their field of industrial engineering (and Dr. Lillian Moller Gilbreth was the first industrial/organizational psychologist.)  To me, they should have just called this movie something different. It could have really been a good movie if they had stuck with the real story (even if it was likely embellished a bit).<br />
"A man's kiss is his signature"  Mae West</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1989102</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1989102</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Original 1950 version much better on Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>robert-macc</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 24, 2015 06:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This wasn't a remake but an adaption of the book.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1989101</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1989101</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Original 1950 version much better on Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DarcyBrandon</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 15, 2015 08:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love the original so much and I was hesitant to watch this remake.<br />
The remake was a real let down. The original was so cute and sweet, I wish the remake didn't go for all the slapstick.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1989100</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1989100</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Original 1950 version much better on Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nerevar59</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 04, 2015 10:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Steve Martin is so wrong for this movie.Just as bad as Father of the Bride.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1989099</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1989099</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 05:56:30 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>