<![CDATA[film was great]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Terminal

wii11 — 11 years ago(February 05, 2015 09:06 PM)

people on IMDb take their criticism too seriously (as usual). people like different taste in movies. this was a great film and i would have nominated Tom Hanks for an Oscar for his role.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/238036/film-was-greatRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 15:20:33 GMTMon, 04 May 2026 07:09:34 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to film was great on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:09:38 GMT]]>stevenvh — 10 years ago(October 11, 2015 06:54 AM)

It's a great film indeed, but I don't agree with the Academy Award nomination. Hanks' acting was quite good, but not extraordinary or outstanding.
Rome! By all means, Rome.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1992750https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1992750Mon, 04 May 2026 07:09:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to film was great on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:09:37 GMT]]>CasseroleWorshipper — 10 years ago(July 14, 2015 07:08 PM)

I like it too. Kind of think they tried to make too much of a villain of Stanley Tucci's character and it could've done without Amelia and Gupta, but overall nice lighthearted comedy. It always makes me laugh and it has a unique story.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1992749https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1992749Mon, 04 May 2026 07:09:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to film was great on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:09:35 GMT]]>parsahsz-tractor — 10 years ago(May 19, 2015 01:00 PM)

I agree with you.this movie was so good!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1992748https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1992748Mon, 04 May 2026 07:09:35 GMT