<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Way better than Children of Men]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Babylon A.D.</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>fernandez_b101</strong> — <em>16 years ago(July 25, 2009 07:43 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Is it just me or did anyone else think thiswas better than children of men?<br />
They both touched on the same subject, this however had just the right amount of realism and alot better action.<br />
Plus Vin could take Clive anyday and he's a way better actor</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/238079/way-better-than-children-of-men</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 01:18:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/238079.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Prismark10</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 21, 2016 05:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Children of Men was good. This was not.<br />
It's that man again!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993159</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993159</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ezzy666</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 03, 2014 10:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The changed too many details from the book when they made Children of Men.<br />
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993158</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993158</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ChazzJazz</strong> — <em>12 years ago(August 15, 2013 09:31 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Children of Men was about Clive Owens' character mainlyI did NOT care for Neo-Eve, (maybe because she was black boooooooo LOL ) There was not much interaction between the Neo-Eve and Clive Owens character on any level. It was mainly clive owens and julianna moore for a half of the movie and then she dies,<br />
then the movie switched over to the army protecting eve and then an internal sabotage<br />
And as one earlier poster mentioned, we have two strong female characters in Babylon, that counterbalance a meathead that Arnie used to play.<br />
The meathead was a pawn in a bigger game, not the main lead.<br />
<a href="http://myimpressionz.tk" rel="nofollow ugc">http://myimpressionz.tk</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993157</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993157</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>racnauj</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 17, 2013 01:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">better??? this movie didn't have any sense at all! it was completely childish</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993156</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993156</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>happiness_is_easy</strong> — <em>13 years ago(April 09, 2012 09:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ok now I understand! The original poster has just explained to me why rubbish like "Big Momma's House" fills up the multiplex's.<br />
I wondered who pays good money to see bad movies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993155</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993155</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chiffmonkey</strong> — <em>15 years ago(February 09, 2011 11:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Are you kidding me? Children of Men is the only film in history to pull off a convincing portrayal of the future.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993154</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993154</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dont_b_so_BBC</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 14, 2009 07:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No, it's not just you.<br />
Children of Men was put together much better since no one was messing with the directing/editing of the film and so feel more "realistic/believable" to some people. If nothing else, it was a more coherent/comprehensible, not mention well-crafted film. But I'll take cyberpunk over apocalyptic sci-fi any day.<br />
And the apocalyptic back-story in Children of Men is just as un-realistic as the one Cyberpunk one in Babylon A.D., if not more so while the near-future described in Babylon A.D., with the exception of sci-fi gimmick/device cyber-technology, actually mirrors ours more closely/realistically.<br />
E.g. Some people living it up while others starve, great advances in technology which are just "technical" and don't really bring peace/happiness, etc..<br />
Why do people who don't care keep telling other people not to care?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993153</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993153</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lorddeseiz</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 12, 2009 01:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Children of Man is alot better. The realism in that one is far more intense. I guess you would say that babylon AD is better if you like more flashy shiney over the top eplosions and spiffy gadgets that make no sense and defy all laws of fysics, then yea, babylon is better.<br />
If youre more into raw realism and inteligent acting, Children of man will be better.<br />
Personaly I enjoyed them both, have them both on DVD, but if I had to choose id be CoM. Babylon for a brain at zero shootemup, CoM good drama.<br />
And i dont understand whats everyone seeing in Vin Diesel, he just another dumb muscle ? He would never be able to play Clives part in CoM and be as believable as Clive was. Remember the burial scene of Susan ? Like hell Vin can do THAT.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">Any last words ?<br />
Shut the <em>beep</em> up</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993152</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993152</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bugyell-2</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 11, 2009 12:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Clive would trounce Vin. He'd drink Vin under the table, make him smoke some Strawberry Cough then stomp him to death with his kinky Carnaby Street shoes.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993151</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993151</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>KJax50</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 07, 2009 08:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">NO WAY NO HOW</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993150</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993150</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FactUnderChecK</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 27, 2009 06:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">surface loving ignorance principle reason, more a less a staple to the overall feel? what are u talking about. please, dont even try to sound intilligent if your going to finish a comment with FAIL.<br />
i didnt even enjoy this movie that much, but children of men is just pretentious much like those who enjoyed it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993149</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993149</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>evil_lawn_gnome</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 26, 2009 01:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Actors are not the only principle reason to enjoy any flick but more a less a staple to the over all feel. Children of Men is a good movie because it made me feel something other than the sound of the bass from a speaker every time Vin Diesel blew something up. My conclusion: COM= Win sltcs6010= FAIL</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993148</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993148</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FactUnderChecK</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 23, 2009 12:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">whats with all the children of men love? your all gay. you just like it coz you love clive owen.<br />
children of men wasnt bringing an original idea, it was just like all the other 'planet it chaos' modern post appocolyptic movies with guns. except worse because it had an ambigious ending which ment nothing.<br />
children of men sucked dick. masterpiece?? i bet you all think v for vendetta is a masterpiece as well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993147</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993147</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>LifeIsGoodHere</strong> — <em>16 years ago(October 11, 2009 11:19 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">There is NO comparisonhowever, this is one of Vin Diesel's better movies. Children of Men was a very intelligent movie and I usually am not a sci-fi nut. It was appealing to more audiences than the typical far-out sci-fi flicks arejust MHO.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993146</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993146</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>veedu</strong> — <em>16 years ago(September 30, 2009 03:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Children  of Men was a very smart, thought provoking movie, Babylon was just a dumb action flick, with rubish acting and storyline.<br />
Fyack Yu!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993145</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993145</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>XTRADER</strong> — <em>16 years ago(September 26, 2009 11:26 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">it's official "you're an idiot" if you really think this!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993144</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993144</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Philmosaur</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 18, 2009 09:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I saw this on cable and am really glad I only wasted time on it. While there were some interesting visuals, the actions scenes were very poorly edited, the story was far from original, the dialog was stilted, and there were so many times I thought "WTF?" that the only way I could suffer through the whole disaster was to accept that this was just a mess and see if it could get worse.  "Children of Men" was a good film, this was an over-budgeted TV movie, not in the same league.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993143</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993143</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>baykid650</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 15, 2009 03:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">First of all, <em>beep</em>! It takes a lot just to register and be able to post on imdb.  Second of all, you're an idiot. The only reason I registered was to tell you you're an idiot.  Babylon AD, though probably not as bad as they say, still sucks more golfballs through a hose than a bagless upright on an infomercial.  Now, I like me some Vin Diesel in a flick every now and again.  None of that Pacifier <em>beep</em> mind you.  But this movie is just Minority Report + Children of Men + the Transporter = Futuristic Gibber(s+hit) If you really thought this was better than Children of Men, than you should probably stop being.  I doubt it's worth it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993142</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993142</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>elmuhfuh</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 10, 2009 06:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">when you say vin diesel approaches his craft in a different way are you implying that hes an actor? i never really saw vin diesel that way. thats an interesting thought.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993141</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993141</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ThrowingChicken</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 09, 2009 09:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If you view the forum as nested then you can see who everyone is replying to.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993140</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993140</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>protolexis</strong> — <em>16 years ago(October 21, 2009 01:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If you were directing your response at him you should have said "@ Mermaid" or something along those lines. There are dozens of responses to the OP and other posters - we aren't psychic. If you had any intellect you'd know to do that.<br />
"Join the army, see the world, meet interesting people - and kill 'em."   - Woody Allen</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993139</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993139</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>grey_outlaw</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 21, 2009 12:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was actually replying to Mermaidbronze but if you feel the need to feel intellectually superior to others, join Mermaid and go for it too!<br />
" It's The Fourth Of The Trilogies!"<br />
Lord Of The Ringtones, Orange Net.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993138</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993138</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ray_da_rat</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 13, 2009 11:46 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i really hope this guy is jokingthis movie was patheticCOM is one one the best movies this decade<br />
and vin better than owenlmao, this kid must be 12 and thinks fast and furious is a good movie..<br />
"Godamnit Jack Bauer. You really are the man."-Dennis Reynolds</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993137</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993137</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Way better than Children of Men on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>protolexis</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 11, 2009 02:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wall of text? I typed five sentences in total and proper grammar was used. I realize it's more than what you're used to reading so it's all good.<br />
"Join the army, see the world, meet interesting people - and kill 'em."   - Woody Allen</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993136</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993136</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:17:14 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>