<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Enougt said :-)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Babylon A.D.</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ehed76</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 14, 2014 06:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Enougt said <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":-)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/238106/enougt-said</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:15:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/238106.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:20:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Enougt said :-) on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:20:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Kyumonryu</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 25, 2014 04:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ehm yes it actually does. Taste is not to be evaluated, what bad taste is for you might be good taste for another person. Taste is not objective.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993308</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993308</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:20:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Enougt said :-) on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:20:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sackofwhine</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 03, 2014 12:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That doesnt mean that people cant have bad taste <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993307</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993307</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:20:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Enougt said :-) on Mon, 04 May 2026 07:20:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dawnrunsamok</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 18, 2014 02:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Amen! Can I get a late-night, movie-o-the-week hallelujah!<br />
If more people accepted this basic truth you've stated, then I'd bet that these boards would be much less dysfunctional, and ugly. In the recent past, I disagreed with one self-described Fanboy; later he looked up my watchlist and proceeded with a vile character assassination across the boards, based purely on my personal taste. As if it were a social disease. Apparently, many Ops are just as dysfunctional as the IMDb community.<br />
Whew! I feel better. Thanks, friend, for shinning a bit of sanity in a swiftly darkening corner of the interwebs.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993306</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1993306</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 07:20:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>