<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Impulse Killers - Sympathetic or Not?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cold Case</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ACFan71</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 26, 2016 03:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I am not sure if calling them "impulse killers" is the correct term for what I have in mind, but in a lot of the episodes the victim is killed by someone who really cares for them, but lashes out in the heat of passion or fails to intervene, which leads to the victim's death.  Lashing out examples include<br />
The Debut<br />
,<br />
The Crossing<br />
,<br />
It's Raining Men<br />
,<br />
The Sleepover<br />
,<br />
The Hen House<br />
, among others.  And for failing to intervene, I would put<br />
Stand Up and Holler<br />
in this category.<br />
So, my question is, of those who did not fully intend to kill the person, who do you sympathize with?  Who do you not?  And not to split hairs, but I think that the "killer" in<br />
The River<br />
and in<br />
Boy Crazy<br />
are not strictly speaking responsible because<br />
the victims in those cases asked to be killed<br />
.<br />
To start off, I don't find the killer in<br />
The Sleepover<br />
to be sympathetic, despite the fact that<br />
she was a young girl<br />
. And I don't think that the victim in<br />
It's Raining Men<br />
would have<br />
outed his brother<br />
, which seemed to be the primary reason for the death, plus the death was rather brutal.<br />
I'm having a hard time coming up with sympathetic impulse killers (I think that<br />
The Blackout<br />
might fit the bill, but I am hazy on the details as I haven't seen it in years), which is partly why I asked the question.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/238455/impulse-killers-sympathetic-or-not</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 12:57:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/238455.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 08:09:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Impulse Killers - Sympathetic or Not? on Mon, 04 May 2026 08:09:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Razor187</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 06, 2016 11:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not really. A lot of the time the unsub is complicit in the cover up and/or directly benefits from the death. There are also a couple (tennis episode comes to mind) who were ticking time bombs and bound to kill someone eventually.<br />
Roller Girl's though would be my exception since that was legitimately an accident.<br />
And so Governor Devlin, because even the cost of freedom can be too high, I REFUSE your pardon!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1995775</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1995775</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 08:09:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>