I thought the entire point was to avoid tragedy.
Not to self righteously crow about whether or not you could predict the future.
"Without education and intellectualism there is no morality."

PAMBO WAS RIGHT
:
http://commieblaster.com/obamacrimes/index.html

He was. Quantitative easing.

When did record highs ever stop Republicans from claiming Obama was ruining the economy?

Sorry if you can't understand it but I don't know how to dumb it down any further

Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand

I don't know anyone who said that. Most people expected a bump upon starting his term
What they are saying is that if he follows through with what he's promised, like trying to renegotiate trade agreements and treaties, and slapping higj taxes on trade with Mexico to pay for his wall, he could start a trade war which could cause the DOW to tumble and negatively effect economies all over the worldExactly.
Though I find a lot of people on the Right look more for the immediate result and not the long-term.
Everything you just said was all backwards.

Yup.
That guy was wrong.
Good thing all us liberals got together and elected him as our one and only mouthpiece.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/election-night-2016/paul-krugman-the-economic-fallout
By PAUL KRUGMAN
It really does now look like President Donald J. Trump, and markets are plunging. When might we expect them to recover?
Frankly, I find it hard to care much, even though this is my specialty. The disaster for America and the world has so many aspects that the economic ramifications are way down my list of things to fear.
Still, I guess people want an answer: If the question is when markets will recover, a first-pass answer is never.
Libs still trying to rewrite history.

I don't know anyone who said that. Most people expected a bump upon starting his term
What they are saying is that if he follows through with what he's promised, like trying to renegotiate trade agreements and treaties, and slapping higj taxes on trade with Mexico to pay for his wall, he could start a trade war which could cause the DOW to tumble and negatively effect economies all over the world
Exactly.
Though I find a lot of people on the Right look more for the immediate result and not the long-term.

I don't know anyone who said that. Most people expected a bump upon starting his term
What they are saying is that if he follows through with what he's promised, like trying to renegotiate trade agreements and treaties, and slapping higj taxes on trade with Mexico to pay for his wall, he could start a trade war which could cause the DOW to tumble and negatively effect economies all over the world
But he says a lot of things. Only time will tell if he follows through. One thing for sure, he is finding out that this job that he is unqualified for is a lot harder than he thought

Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand

Still pretending to be American, weirdo?
"Whether homosexuality causes less harm (than slavery) is debatable" -
Hada

Creep, you said Hillary would win in an ELECTORAL landslide, the biggest since Reagan in 84. It's amazing even though you were 100% wrong for 12 months you are still acting like a pretentious smug know it all douchebag. The polls run by Democratic Party affiliated media outlets aka the mainstream media also claimed Hillary would win in an electoral landslide. This is why you fled the board like a coward after the election and have only slithered out now because you can out and out lie and hope people don't remember all your 12 months of falsehoods and wrong predictions

Trump has a 2% chance of winning the primaries.

The polls predict popular vote. The polls were right, Hillary got more votes. Presidential forecasts, which use polls to predict the likelihood of a candidate winning are the ones that you could say we're wrong.

Mainstream liberal media was predicting a Hillary landslide.
The "fake news" was saying Trump actually had a very good chance.
So who is the real fake?