<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[So what is it NC-17 for?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Mysterious Skin</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>meowingdoggos</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 20, 2016 05:50 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This movie looks really interesting and especially by the fact that it is directed by Gregg Araki, who directed my favorite movie White Bird In A Blizzard AND these two movies have the same music composers (not gonna lie, the score for WBIAB was amazing).<br />
But what made this movie NC-17? I'm underage so I'm just curious. The IMDb page doesn't say anything why it's rated that.<br />
WBIAB was rated R and definitely deserved that rating for the sex scenes, nudity, language and the thematic material. Is this any much worse?<br />
If you do know why this one's NC-17, I wouldn't mind if you'd say it. Also maybe your opinion. And I'm not going to read the parents' guide cause spoilers <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":p" alt="😛" /><br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/238600/so-what-is-it-nc-17-for</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 23:34:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/238600.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 08:37:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to So what is it NC-17 for? on Mon, 04 May 2026 08:37:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tylerobrien-40981</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 11, 2016 02:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In Australia it was rated R for:high level child sexual abuse themes, high level sexual violence and pedophile theme. Which pretty much sums it up exept for other sexual acts of a more consenting nature. However in america the NC-17 is most likely down to a prolonged sequence at the end of the film involving sexually explicit duologue.  Child molestation, other sex related activitys and rape are all discussed in depth, and implied visually in a much more suttle manner, never the less it was enough to earn that rating.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1997214</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1997214</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 08:37:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to So what is it NC-17 for? on Mon, 04 May 2026 08:37:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>GruesomeTwosome</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 05, 2016 03:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Very frank depictions of child molestation, a rather disturbing scene of a confused boy (molestation victim) performing a sex act on another young boy, a rather violent male rape scene, etc. The whole film revolves around material that most people would find uncomfortable, to say the least.<br />
Fighting the frizzies, at 11.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1997213</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1997213</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 08:37:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>