<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[why was the picture not great was it cus of it being a cheap movie]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Gold Diggers</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>bigevil5713</strong> — <em>19 years ago(September 12, 2006 05:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">why was the picture not great was it cus of it being a cheap movie</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239076/why-was-the-picture-not-great-was-it-cus-of-it-being-a-cheap-movie</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 11:19:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239076.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 10:15:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>