<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Awful awful awful]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Black Dahlia</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>victorherm54</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 08, 2015 10:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This is how truly dreadful this movie is, it compelled me to create this topic.<br />
I gave it a 3/10 only because it is functionally sound - i.e. the camera work and lighting are competently done.<br />
It is so, so, so bad and yet it's trying so hard to be cool and noire, that's what makes it so terrible, the laughably bad attempt at being sexy and dark.<br />
That is all, I shouldn't waste one more second of my life discussing this garbage film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239421/awful-awful-awful</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 18:28:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239421.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Awful awful awful on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Ktw12</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 09, 2017 09:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I had this film on my watchlist for a long time and finally got around to watching it. I stopped watching it after an hour. It was terrible.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005008</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005008</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Awful awful awful on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Moonlighty</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 19, 2016 11:38 AM)</em></p>
<h2>Widely by who? Where? Obviously on this site it's hated, but it seems you think your opinion=widely agreed upon opinion without any basis for thinking that accept a snide and ignorant attitude.</h2>
<p dir="auto">Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that I'll be over here looking through your stuff.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005007</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005007</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Awful awful awful on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>slidell333</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 01, 2016 01:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Besides a small minority this is widely considered awful. Like I posted one of two movies I walked out on. We went to see a mi i.e. about the Black Dahlia and I've read his books and we saw a movie aboutI dunnoNOT the Black Dahlia. And what it tried to do, it failed miserably.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005006</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005006</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>