<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Black Dahlia</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>bradjanet</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 04, 2010 03:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This was so woodenly acted, badly scripted, soporific , it has to be one of the worst of the decade. Only the scene with K.D.Lang singing "Love For Sale" and Fiona Shaw's scene as the mad Mom, had any merit <a href="http://whatsoever.It" rel="nofollow ugc">whatsoever.It</a> has some of the worst cigarette-acting I've seen, (where smoking is used by lazy actors as a substitute for a performance).<br />
But you ARE Blanche  and I AM.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239431/worst-of-its-decade-with-2-good-scenes</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:23:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239431.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>henrimaine</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 28, 2016 07:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The movie was not spectacular, but there were more scenes than two that deserve to be commended. The screen test scenes were good (it's interesting that De Palma himself was the voice behind the camera). Also, the scene were the police officer spots a blonde girl in the park and starts to chase her - that scene had great Hitchcockian tension. De Palma often likes to emulate Hitchcock in his movies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005037</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005037</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bradjanet</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 10, 2015 09:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was talking about movies, not crap.<br />
But you ARE Blanche  and I AM.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005036</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005036</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dalldorfw</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 11, 2015 08:43 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">My taste isn't too consistent, is it? You're not the first to have pointed that out.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005035</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005035</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bradjanet</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 04, 2014 03:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">tsk  your sporadically interesting horror-list would almost suggest a more refined palate.<br />
But you ARE Blanche  and I AM.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005034</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005034</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dalldorfw</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 03, 2014 11:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Snoresville. Yes, the perfectly described the three titles I just listed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005033</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005033</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bradjanet</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 03, 2014 07:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It was Snoresville.<br />
But you ARE Blanche  and I AM.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005032</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005032</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dalldorfw</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 17, 2013 05:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, this is the worst movie of the decade that spawned 'Open Water', 'The Disappearance of Alice Creed' and '30 Days Of Night'. Com'on, are you serious?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005031</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005031</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005030</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005030</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bradjanet</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 14, 2010 08:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Brian de Palma has to count as one of the world's most uneven directors  look at his record:<br />
THE GOOD, or NOT BAD<br />
Blowout  outstanding thriller. One of the best in the genre.<br />
Carrie  a beautifully acted and directed horror classic<br />
Phantom of the Paradise  dated, but interesting and quirky for its time.<br />
Sisters  slightly disjointed but gripping early effort.<br />
The Fury  a bit suspect in the sexual politics  but gripping<br />
Dressed to Kill .. looks a million dollars, but a bit over-rated in my opinion.<br />
Body Double  more glamorous misogyny, confusing, but with the great<br />
tunnel scene.<br />
Scarface  over the top, but almost great.<br />
Raising Cain  a cheese-fest, but I love it. Another great extended take.<br />
TRULY AWFUL:<br />
The Untouchables Only the railway station sequence worked.<br />
Unbelievable situations, awful dialogue AND Kevin Costner.<br />
Obsession  Tedious "Vertigo" rip-off.<br />
The Bonfire of the Vanities  after a masterful opening sequence,<br />
goes nowhere.<br />
Snake Eyes  Flash trash with one good sequence and a mail-in<br />
Nick Cage performance.<br />
The Black Dahlia  Boring, boring, boring, badly acted, badly scripted and<br />
atrociously directed. (Ellroy said he liked it, which<br />
means that as a critic he makes a great novelist).<br />
Mission Impossible  meh not really a personal effort, it was always<br />
going to be a franchise.<br />
I may have been a bit hard on Kevin Costner  Open Range is very good.<br />
But you ARE Blanche  and I AM.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005029</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005029</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:13:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Worst of its decade, with 2 good scenes. on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>absolutebloodyshower</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 14, 2010 01:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Couldn't agree more, absolutely diabolical.Everything LA Confidential did well this did completely the <a href="http://opposite.It" rel="nofollow ugc">opposite.It</a> felt like wading through treacle &amp; how could such a supposedly decent bunch of actors (&amp; Josh Hartnet) all turn in the the worst performances of their lives all at the same time? De Palma, I'm talking to you!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005028</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2005028</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:12:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>