<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[My issue with this film]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Click</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>universal_debonaire</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 30, 2015 05:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I haven't seen the film in a while so apologies if I get it slightly wrong but, the moral of the story is "you shouldn't have a desire to skip through your life because you should appreciate everything about it" right? Or something like that.<br />
But hold the phone!!<br />
Wasn't everything going great for Sandlers character until the remote started using its memory function? It's almost like the writers had to add this detail of the remote skipping repeated circumstances to avoid the idea of a life controlling remote control actually being a good thing. If the remote didn't have the memory function and he only skipped through being sick or his wife talking once or twice in his whole life, then the story wouldn't have had such a horrible outcome. And there would have been no way for the writers to preach "appreciate every detail of your life and you're a really bad person if you have any desire to skip through bits of it"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239680/my-issue-with-this-film</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:43:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239680.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:56:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My issue with this film on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:56:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>robinjordan</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 20, 2016 01:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">But he's human - we all are and that message WAS the message sent.<br />
A lot<br />
of people in this world would be consumed by such an item! Perhaps it seems entirely illogical to you, but it's actually very realistic. What if something like that was at your fingertips? Sure, you could say 'I would never do that, I know myself," but have you seen the people in this world? I'm not saying you would go the route Sanders did, but there are a LOT who would. Mike (?) showed us just how quickly a human could go from being so satisfied with life, to getting greedy and selfish and consumed with this amazing remote. Look at lottery winners! I'll bet you over half of them are completely and utterly satisfied with their lives before they win. But look how messed up some of their lives become? They become consumed with their money, forget about their old life and drown in the potential new possibilities. Well? Sanders won //his// lottery in this movie. He got a remote and got greedy. This movie is entirely realistic and sends a pretty good message in the long run.<br />
So yes, I think the message is, "Appreciate what you have" and also "You don't know what you've got until it's gone." Because we are creatures that truly don't understand that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007232</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007232</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:56:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My issue with this film on Mon, 04 May 2026 11:56:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>novastar_6</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 30, 2015 09:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Except that's the way some people are in life, they don't stop and evaluate the way they act at certain times and instead just repeat the same behavior every single time they're put back in that situation without even stopping to think about it. It forced him to look at how he acted and what he had to do to fix that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007231</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007231</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 11:56:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>