<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I have to go with Sin City.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sin City</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Filmbuff29</strong> — <em>3 years ago(March 09, 2023 06:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have to go with Sin City.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239712/i-have-to-go-with-sin-city</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:06:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239712.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:00:39 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I have to go with Sin City. on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:00:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>frtt wins3 pHd</strong> — <em>3 years ago(March 09, 2023 06:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i'm with you. sin city was so much better then the sequel.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007419</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007419</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:00:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I have to go with Sin City. on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:00:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NZer</strong> — <em>3 years ago(March 09, 2023 06:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Me too.  I enjoyed the second one but it was a pale shadow of the first.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007418</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007418</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:00:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>