<![CDATA[The Dented Logic]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sin City

Soodinum — 10 years ago(July 15, 2015 06:42 PM)

of the recut - why couldn't they have stitched all the recut sections into one film?
Ending with credits isn't too bad for the longer stories, but for the very short sections (like the two with Josh H), having to sit through credits again is plain stupid.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239745/the-dented-logicRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 15:13:44 GMTMon, 04 May 2026 12:05:24 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to The Dented Logic on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:33 GMT]]>witchkeygirl — 9 years ago(October 11, 2016 09:53 AM)

Then you missed the point of recut. They're not meant to be one whole cinematic experience.
The full cinematic experience is the theatrical cut.
Agreed!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007659https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007659Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Dented Logic on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:32 GMT]]>DesiredFX — 9 years ago(July 25, 2016 02:47 AM)

Rodriguez says they were presented in pieces to preserve the stories as Miller originally wrote them. The theatrical cut was chopped up and moved around with some pieces discarded the way it was because that's where Rodriguez put his emphasis in trying to put together a whole evening of entertainment.
#TeamZemo

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007658https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007658Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Dented Logic on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:30 GMT]]>Soodinum — 10 years ago(March 29, 2016 03:11 PM)

Blocked. There's no point trying to talk to someone like you.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007657https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007657Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Dented Logic on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:29 GMT]]>preachcaleb — 10 years ago(March 29, 2016 02:51 PM)

Perhaps you missed the point. FFing through things doesn't exactly help the cinematic experience. Removing those titles would make the recut watchable AS A FILM.
Then you missed the point of recut. They're not meant to be one whole cinematic experience.
The full cinematic experience is the theatrical cut.
Let's be bad guys.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007656https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007656Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Dented Logic on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:28 GMT]]>Mr-Fusion — 10 years ago(November 22, 2015 11:33 AM)

FFing through things doesn't exactly help the cinematic experience. Removing those titles would make the recut watchable AS A FILM.
I agree with this. Unless you're trying to get past something gruesome like a torture or rape scene, the fast forward button is never good news for a movie.

This is what Jerry sees when he closes his eyes at night: topless Leslie glued to a horse!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007655https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007655Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Dented Logic on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:27 GMT]]>Soodinum — 10 years ago(November 17, 2015 12:47 PM)

Perhaps you missed the point. FFing through things doesn't exactly help the cinematic experience. Removing those titles would make the recut watchable AS A FILM.
'Then' and 'than' are different words - stop confusing them.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007654https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007654Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Dented Logic on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:25 GMT]]>preachcaleb — 10 years ago(November 17, 2015 12:44 PM)

Ending with credits isn't too bad for the longer stories, but for the very short sections (like the two with Josh H), having to sit through credits again is plain stupid.
Yeah, that is stupid. Just hit the fast forward button to skip them. You don't actually have to sit through them.
Can't stop the signal.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007653https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2007653Mon, 04 May 2026 12:05:25 GMT