<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[my theory on the end]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Edukators</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>nemeses88</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 06, 2013 11:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">A lot of people say that in the end the note saying "people never change" means that Hardenburg when back into his usual capitalist self, and evetually told on them<br />
BUT I interpreted the last note in a whole different light<br />
The note saying "people never change" to me meant that Hardenburg was still a revolutionary at heart. And that he let them go into his home again to 'legitimize' them as a group.<br />
Obviously they had to 'break' into his home again to leave the note. But why would they do that or risk it a second time? unless Hardenburg let them in on purpose.<br />
By letting them leave the note and then having Hardenburg reporting on them, the edukators would of gather more notoriety and more recognition as a revolutionary group.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239855/my-theory-on-the-end</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 01:14:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/239855.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:28:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to my theory on the end on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:28:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>canadamelody</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 02, 2014 04:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I find it amusing how everyone wants to complicate his betrayal at the end.<br />
It is so obvious to me what happened. Had he been single he NEVER would have<br />
called the cops. His wife must have given him an ear full. So the Hen pecked<br />
guy called the cops.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2008803</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2008803</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:28:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to my theory on the end on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:28:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nimrond</strong> — <em>12 years ago(September 03, 2013 10:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">a) the note said "SOME people never change"<br />
b) the note was placed in their old flat (or possibly Jule's), not Hardenberg's house<br />
c) we see Hardenberg pondering an idea before we're shown the police scene - what was he so undecided about, if not whether he should call the police or not? He never agreed with them on their methods (breaking and entering, kidnapping as a last resort).</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2008802</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2008802</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:28:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to my theory on the end on Mon, 04 May 2026 12:28:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>zwoopmugen</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 12, 2013 09:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That, orrrr<br />
They are just irrational little kids risking jail time for doing something that has virtually zero impact on society.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2008801</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2008801</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:28:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>