<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I saw this last night for the first time. Once I caught on that most of the movie was going to be told in montage, I got]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Dreamgirls</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>peterwcohen-300-947200</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 08, 2017 08:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I saw this last night for the first time. Once I caught on that most of the movie was going to be told in montage, I got bored and dropped it. It's fine to use montage once, maybe twice, in a movie, but this one was using it constantly. Very flimsy storytelling. It's no substitute for narrative structure.<br />
Also, the songs were fairly unmemorable, but that's another thread. It could have been a good movie despite that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/240770/i-saw-this-last-night-for-the-first-time-once-i-caught-on-that-most-of-the-movie-was-going-to-be-told-in-montage-i-got</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 10:42:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/240770.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 15:19:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>