<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Extras</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>fuzzout987</strong> — <em>17 years ago(December 11, 2008 02:24 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now that she is in The Reader and it's the big Oscar baiting holocaust movie this year. Since the episode she was in satirized actors who make holocaust movies just to get Oscars.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/241042/the-kate-winslet-episode-is-sort-of-ironic-now</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 01:21:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/241042.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HelloMyNameIsMrBurns</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 10, 2015 06:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And she won!!!!!!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019517</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019517</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Krustallos</strong> — <em>15 years ago(April 06, 2010 07:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just saw the rerun episode on one of the UK cable channels - topped and tailed with cast interviews. Gervais: "I'm not exactly saying it's<br />
my<br />
Oscar, but."<br />
I used to want to change the world. Now I just want to leave the room with a little dignity.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019516</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019516</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>victoriaversailles</strong> — <em>17 years ago(March 12, 2009 05:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Basically.<br />
DON'T PRESS THE "REPLY" AT THE TOP OF MY POST UNLESS YOU'RE REPLYING TO<br />
ME<br />
FFS</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019515</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019515</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019514</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019514</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019513</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019513</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Kiwifalling</strong> — <em>16 years ago(May 12, 2009 05:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Especially when she was competing for the Oscar with Meryl Streep's nun. Even more hilarious.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019512</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019512</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bigscreen2</strong> — <em>16 years ago(April 28, 2009 01:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Exactly! I made a thread about this at the Reader board.I didn't know there was already one existed.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/10976051/board/flat/136717552" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/10976051/board/flat/136717552</a><br />
Go Kate ! She should do comedy more.Brilliant and versatile actress.I have a question.Had she already sign for The Reader when she made Extras ? Just curious.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019511</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019511</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019510</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019510</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fuzzout987</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 24, 2009 11:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just hope next she plays someone with cerebral palsy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019509</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019509</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>zoltan42</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 24, 2009 05:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"Shame she didn't mention the irony in her acceptance speech"<br />
I saw footage of her post-award backstage interview, and a reporter mentioned "Extras.", which seemed to cause a sudden flash of "Oh my god, that's right." in Winslet. I think in the moment on stage she had other things on her mind.<br />
Do not taunt happy fun ball!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019508</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019508</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Max_cinefilo89</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 24, 2009 02:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">True, but since the Extras joke was Oscar-centric, something more could be done about it. Shame she didn't mention the irony in her acceptance speech<br />
How you doin'?<br />
-Joey Tribbiani</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019507</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019507</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fuzzout987</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 23, 2009 11:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Gervais did go on the Golden Globes and say on stage, I told you Winslet do a holocaust film and the awards start pouring in.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019506</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019506</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Max_cinefilo89</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 23, 2009 11:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If Gervais really is planning to do another special episode, he could work the joke into the script, like Andy runs into Winslet and says: "By the way, congratulations for winning the Oscar!". That would be funny<br />
How you doin'?<br />
-Joey Tribbiani</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019505</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019505</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fuzzout987</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 23, 2009 02:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm just glad the academy proved the cliche, do a holocaust film, get an Oscar true.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019504</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019504</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ExpressingYourself</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 23, 2009 09:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The original poster: I remember pointing this out as soon as Winslet was cast in the Reader - I just knew she'd win an Oscar for it! So funny<br />
What the hell's<br />
wrong<br />
with expressing yourself?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019503</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019503</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>century-letters</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 28, 2009 06:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, just rewatched that episode a couple of days ago and it's hilarious. She should have made a reference to it in her acceptance speech. Haha.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019502</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019502</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fuzzout987</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 22, 2009 10:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well she won for the Reader, I guess this makes the Winslet episode funnier. And kind of lame how easy it is to predict how easily the academy is to predict.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019501</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019501</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019500</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019500</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dreamonforever1</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 12, 2009 03:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">kate winslet's "extras" episode was one of the funniest moments of that show's season.<br />
i haven't seen "the reader," but i did see "revolutionary road," and she deserves some kind of award for her performance in that picture.<br />
i also just recently saw "holy smoke" again and, even though that film gets bad reviews, i love her in it. i also like the fact that she's never had a problem with tastefully done frontal nudity (as in "hideous kinky"), either <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=";-)" alt="😉" /><br />
gregory 21209.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019499</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019499</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Max_cinefilo89</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 04, 2009 11:36 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Plus, it's "written" by Patrick Stewart! Anyway, getting back to the original subject, in case Winslet doesn't win (Oscars aren't an exact science, after all), the next thing she should do to be "guaranteed" an award is to play a mental - in WWII Germany! That way she'll definitely win<br />
How you doin'?<br />
-Joey Tribbiani</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019498</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019498</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>whynot2</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 01, 2009 11:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">another excuse for gratuitous nudity is always welcome.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019497</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019497</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fuzzout987</strong> — <em>17 years ago(January 29, 2009 03:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hollywood doesn't need another excuse for gratuitous nudity.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019496</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019496</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Max_cinefilo89</strong> — <em>17 years ago(January 29, 2009 03:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If she wins, the next thing they should do is greenlight Patrick Stewart's excuse for gratuitous nudity<br />
How you doin'?<br />
-Joey Tribbiani</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019495</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019495</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The Kate Winslet episode is sort of ironic now on Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fuzzout987</strong> — <em>17 years ago(January 24, 2009 09:03 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No, she plays a woman with cerebral palsy who wants to dance with the New York Ballet, here comes Oscar gold. You know if Winslet wins for The Reader(which is a soulless piece of Oscar bait made simply to win awards) her speech from the episode where she says, "You do a holocaust movie, you're guaranteed an Oscar" is going to be posted on every entertainment news web site and blog. My God, Gervais and Merchant really are geniuses.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019494</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2019494</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:07:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>