<![CDATA[Is the dad supposed to be following his children throughtout the film because he seems to turn up (on his own) at the mo]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — 28 Weeks Later

Crafty78 — 9 years ago(January 23, 2017 06:14 AM)

Is the dad supposed to be following his children throughtout the film because he seems to turn up (on his own) at the most random places? If not then I find it quite laughable that he just seems to be there. I mean what are the chances of that, really?
I also really couldn't stand the way the film was shot, everything is filmed far too close up and the shaky cam really does begin to annoy you after a while. The original is far superior to this, and was done on half the budget.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/241396/is-the-dad-supposed-to-be-following-his-children-throughtout-the-film-because-he-seems-to-turn-up-on-his-own-at-the-moRSS for NodeSun, 17 May 2026 09:16:26 GMTMon, 04 May 2026 17:13:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Is the dad supposed to be following his children throughtout the film because he seems to turn up (on his own) at the mo on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:13:39 GMT]]>Wildman's smol peeny — 3 years ago(January 25, 2023 12:37 PM)

The way the dad was as an infected spoiled the movie for me. This was the only thing I disliked. He either turned or was immune. None of this inbetween bs.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2022565https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2022565Mon, 04 May 2026 17:13:39 GMT