<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Ex Machina</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>bassolinja</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 17, 2016 07:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">and the guy is left screaming in the other room. There was no reason to show Ava walking through the house, getting picked up by the chopper (which raised questions that have been discussed on the board, most importantly, how did the pilot just agree to it and not find it at all suspicious?) and just being out in the city. I really liked the movie, and the scene where she's getting in the elevator would've given us all the relevant information at just the right note to conclude everything, but the outro after that almost ruined it for me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/241495/should-ve-ended-when-the-elevator-doors-close</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 19:00:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/241495.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:17 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BrianTheDog</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 09, 2017 01:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agree, it should be up to the viewers' imagination.   Instead there were questions raised about how she even found the helicopter, knew where to go when she got out and how she paid for it.  Or what her plan was, or if she even had one.  At least someone will likely rescue Caleb given all of his co-workers will be dying to know how his week was, and will find it strange that neither him nor the most important person in the company aren't responding to e-mails/texts, etc.  It was a reclusive facility but not Fort Knox.  Obviously someone delivers food (and liquor!).   Ava seems destined to wander until her power runs out.  Its not as if she comes with an AC cord, her power was based out of Nathan's facility.which begs the question what Caleb's plan was if they managed to get out together.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023492</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023492</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>migity311</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 01, 2017 09:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I 100% agree. First time I watched it, the elevator scene was so intense with the music flaring, and the realization of what was happening and how Ava didn't care about him at all. The extra bit seemed completely unnecessary. I watched it for the 2nd time last week and feel even more strongly about it now.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023491</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023491</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Fashionably_Straight</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 08, 2017 09:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agree 100%<br />
I was blown away at that moment expecting credits. The rest was fine too but yeahthat's where i would've called final cut.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023490</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023490</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>deafoldbat</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 18, 2016 02:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for the link Dennerman <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023489</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023489</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Dennerman</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 16, 2016 06:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Here's a good article that talks about exactly that, and includes the Director's comments on that point of view:<br />
<a href="http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Ex-Machina-Ending-Debate-Movie-3-Minutes-Too-Long-71101.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Ex-Machina-Ending-Debate-Movie-3-Minutes-Too-Long-71101.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023488</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023488</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Tarkus</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 25, 2017 11:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Great answer!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023487</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023487</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bigariw</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 04, 2016 04:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I disagree here because those scenes were pivotal in understanding Ava.  Without those scenes we could clearly state that Ava was the antagonist all along and that the entirety of her dialogue was a game between herself and Nathan and nothing more.  Instead what we see is glimmers of truth to the sentiments that she used to manipulate Caleb  She brushes the wildlife and looks about in wonder.  She takes the helicopter to a metropolitan area and stands in a crowded street observing the people.  They were scenes deliberately written to tell us that Ava wasn't entirely a lie;  that she wasn't some rogue AI hellbent on overpowering her human overlords who went full Skynet the moment she got free.  She was designed to pass as human and that is what she wanted, and that was what she got. Agreed, sometimes less is" more" and that's why the scenes were necessary: because less would have implied the wrong "more."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023486</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023486</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justin40580</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 03, 2016 09:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I also agree.  Sometimes less is more.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023485</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023485</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>matth-806-327494</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 01, 2016 01:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Or she could have murdered the helicopter pilot.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023484</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023484</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should&#x27;ve ended when the elevator doors close on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>zuper_zuper</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 22, 2016 01:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I somewhat agree with you. I don't think the additional scenes ruined anything, but they were somewhat unnecessary. When watching it, I actually wondered if we would get to see whether Ava would free Caleb or leave him trapped. I believe it would have worked well to end the movie before that. But that would be a different movie, and the actual ending also works well.<br />
Regarding the chopper pilot, I found it believable that she was picked up without questions, when you think about the extreme security measures around Nathans estate. It could be that the pilot was simply told to pick up a person there and not be given more information than that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023483</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023483</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:34:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>