<![CDATA[Turing Test]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Ex Machina

KingCobra686 — 9 years ago(November 25, 2016 09:35 PM)

I fully expected that Nathan was going to end up being an AI too, with a real human Nathan hidden somewhere in the house watching everything. The Turing Test would be the fact that Caleb was trying to test Ava and was discussing it with Nathan, and not realizing that he was talking to another AI.
Anyone else think the same thing when they were watching?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/241527/turing-testRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 23:37:59 GMTMon, 04 May 2026 17:37:49 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Turing Test on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:37:53 GMT]]>DempsNoSpace — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 06:36 PM)

I thought so too. I also thought at one point that Caleb was possibly an AI, as he seemingly thought was a possibility as well.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023647https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023647Mon, 04 May 2026 17:37:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Turing Test on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:37:52 GMT]]>KingCobra686 — 9 years ago(November 30, 2016 03:56 PM)

Thanks haha.
I was hoping we would get that ending, but oh well.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023646https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023646Mon, 04 May 2026 17:37:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Turing Test on Mon, 04 May 2026 17:37:50 GMT]]>rainofwalrus — 9 years ago(November 29, 2016 09:13 AM)

That would solve the Problematic_Design complaint entirely. Nicely done! A base within a base would also solve the NoFailsafe(?) complaint as well.
Bravo. I like it. Too bad the film's writer(s) aren't as smart as you.
Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone All of them.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023645https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2023645Mon, 04 May 2026 17:37:50 GMT