<![CDATA[What happened to DNA and CCTV techniques]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Brave One

andyd-1 — 15 years ago(July 28, 2010 05:05 AM)

the subway stations didn't have CCTV to enable a shortlist of suspects leaving to be made? Or any of the other crime scenes had no CCTV cameras anywhere nearby? Spot the same person twice and they've got them these days.
She didn't leave DNA at any scene, including when she was hit on the arm by a crowbar, causing a significant wound? BTW that blood would also have revealed the suspect was female.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/241615/what-happened-to-dna-and-cctv-techniquesRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 02:17:38 GMTMon, 04 May 2026 18:03:52 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to What happened to DNA and CCTV techniques on Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:59 GMT]]>oldmanwillow21 — 10 years ago(October 18, 2015 03:10 AM)

Cell phones and text messages in the 70s?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024841https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024841Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to What happened to DNA and CCTV techniques on Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:58 GMT]]>xffanatic_4ever — 12 years ago(July 07, 2013 02:31 AM)

It was set in modern day NY, but was re-doing the 70s vigilante plot.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024840https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024840Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to What happened to DNA and CCTV techniques on Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:57 GMT]]>Steve Crook — 13 years ago(September 30, 2012 06:31 PM)

Even thought it was only made 5 years ago it seems to be set mainly in the 1970s judging by the fashions and the attitudes. They didn't have as much CCTV or DNA in the 1970s. Although the references to Radiohead were a bit of an anachronism
Steve

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024839https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024839Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to What happened to DNA and CCTV techniques on Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:56 GMT]]>HillmanHunter — 13 years ago(September 30, 2012 04:54 PM)

Yeah I was wondering the same thing. I know you gotta go with some artistic license, but I found that a step too far.
"Football in the groin, football in the groin"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024838https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024838Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to What happened to DNA and CCTV techniques on Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:54 GMT]]>Eightythreeyearoldguy — 14 years ago(August 24, 2011 09:20 AM)

I know nothing about subways, but it sure would seem that there would have been cameras.
Life, every now and then, behaves as though it had seen too many bad movies

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024837https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024837Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to What happened to DNA and CCTV techniques on Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:53 GMT]]>zephyr-123 — 15 years ago(January 25, 2011 02:44 PM)

I realize this is an old post but I had the same problem with the subway. Don't they have cameras on them now? I liked the movie but found it hard to believe that she wasn't caught on camera.
"We're "us". You're "them". We don't help "thems". Sorry. Paige

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024836https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2024836Mon, 04 May 2026 18:03:53 GMT