Yep, I enjoyed it at the time and I've enjoyed it since - but I'm horrified to realise it come out 10 years ago! Bloody Hell - where did all the time go?
I have always depended on the kindness of Strangers - and the bastards let me down!

And we all will miss saying as much on these message boards. Shame on IMDB for disrespecting their users like this.
"Life goes by pretty fast. If you don't stop to look around once in a while, you could miss it."

I have family members that watch this movie constantly. They watch it more that lil girls watch Frozen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gCBiJ3QJnk&feature=player_embedded

Hellz to the yes we did!

Gen. Ross
: Who's "we"?

I do that to myself once a week at least if I'm being honest.

subtle

This message has been deleted.

That we did. laddie. That we did.

This is the most generously comic of all Marvel films to date, with the zaniest, coolest performances; the stakes are refreshingly low there's no aerial battle with the fate of the world at play in the final act. I liked that.

Come on we all enjoyed this film in every way.

Marvel's 2015 grade has to be an A+ maybe two pluses but that's up for debate.

This message has been deleted.

This all makes me so happy.
I accept your surrender.

I'm not at all sure there will be an Ant-Man stand-alone sequel.
And I don't need one. This story was good.
If Ant-Man gets the kind of shared stories the Black Widow has been getting, that will be fine.
#BringF4Home

I was very disappointed. Pena was so annoying, the villain and plot were dull. MCU's weakest effort. Thank Odin Civil War is next!

I certainly enjoyed it.
#BringFFHome

lol Uber bumped all 3 of these Positive threads within 3 minutes lol with his ThomasMagnumPI sock account
http://www.imdb.com/board/10478970/board/thread/246388864
by ThomasMagnumPI
37 minutes ago (Tue Aug 11 2015
15:50:18
)
IMDb member since August 2005
http://www.imdb.com/board/10478970/board/thread/246163675
now this thread-(Note the time)
by ThomasMagnumPI
26 minutes ago (Tue Aug 11 2015
15:51:48
)
IMDb member since August 2005
What about this?
http://www.imdb.com/board/10478970/board/thread/246956461
this is from another thread-(Literally 2 minutes laters)
by ThomasMagnumPI
26 minutes ago (Tue Aug 11 2015
15:53:41
) Flag | Reply |
IMDb member since August 2005
AoU is still a great movie. The only reason that wasn't at 90% like the first is because of the "big boy on the block" backlash from a few jaded critics.
leemall-"Paul Walkers Death Had Zero Impact On F7's Hype And Box Office Results"

Are WE going to buy this?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0117ULG36/ref=pe_2172320_146433600_em_ti
Marvel's Agent Carter: The Complete First Season [Amazon Exclusive] [Blu-ray]

Oh yeah, before it slips my mind, guerrilla journalism chick aka Anna Akana is hot as ****.
I accept your surrender.

I always thought they were open about what they wanted and didn't want out of a movie, so I could always see value in their review regardless of whether or not I agreed with their general verdict.

When Spider-Man was directed by Sam Raimi, who grew up with a Spider-Man poster on his wall, it was good (two times out of three anyway) even though it was FOX.
I don't agree. Raimi Spider-Man didn't work for me. Mostly because Peter Parker was nothing special before he got his powers. He didn't even have the Spider-Man humor and the whole thing came off as cartoonish. None of the characters felt like real people.
The new home of Welcome to Planet Bob:
http://kingofbob.blogspot.ca/

Apparently Peyton Reed, the director of Ant-Man, is a hard core Ant-Man fan. It surely looks like it.
Josh Trank, director of the Fantastic Four fiasco not so much.
When Spider-Man was directed by Sam Raimi, who grew up with a Spider-Man poster on his wall, it was good (two times out of three anyway) even though it was FOX.
#BringFFHome

It's been a month and everyone is still talking about Ant-Man especially after Fantastic Bore. How can one company get it so right and one get it so wrong?