<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Much Better than Saw II]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Saw III</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>xTHEILLUMINATIx</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 15, 2010 03:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Everyone says Saw II is the best and under-rated film of the series but after watching all 6 movies recentley, I still think Saw III is the best of the bunch.<br />
Do I take life or give it? Who is victim and who is foe?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/242209/much-better-than-saw-ii</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 04:23:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/242209.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:10:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>manchof1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 13, 2016 03:11 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Saw II was kind of boring and I didn't care for any of the characters.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030671</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030671</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:10:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:10:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030670</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030670</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:10:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:10:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Asteri-Atypical</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 09, 2016 08:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I haven't seen Saw III yet, but I found Saw II to be a bit disappointing.  I was hoping they may have ramped up the intrigue and personal dynamics, but, instead, the characters were flatter and less interesting, the puzzles less true to the notion of the testing of the survival instinct and just seemed more a torture maze.  All in all, less intelligent, more gory.<br />
I was wondering if the later installments got better or continued to deteriorate.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">You spell God with a G, I spell Nature with an N. Capital. - Frank Lloyd Wright</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030669</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030669</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:10:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CasseroleWorshipper</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 22, 2016 07:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I prefer 2 frankly.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030668</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030668</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ItsLukeyBitch</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 03, 2016 07:27 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Same here, Saw 3 is a masterpiece, the ending is great and Shawnee Smith done a great performance.<br />
"No one is gonna take my soul away i'm living like Targaryen"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030667</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030667</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>RelpScooby</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 07, 2015 10:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Here's "my thing" and this is HOW I saw it.<br />
The Saw movies that were "odd numbered" seemed to be the best to me.<br />
1,3,5 and the last one being Part 7 aka 3D.<br />
I KNOW, I can't be the only one noticing this trend.<br />
(side note) part 2 was good because of my fantasy woman - Emmanuel<br />
Ok I'm done now.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030666</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030666</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hnt_dnl</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 15, 2015 04:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Saw 2 is a step above one of those Friday the 13th "teens in peril" exercises. That movie is so standard. Saw 3 is much better.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030665</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030665</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Legion_89</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 13, 2015 12:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree; Its my favorite Saw film (darkest feel, best ending and Lynn Denlon is my favorite Saw heroine).<br />
"Its time to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and I'm all outta gum."- Duke Nukem</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030664</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030664</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030663</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030663</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Classic_Movies7</strong> — <em>10 years ago(May 31, 2015 04:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I disagree , Saw 2 is better</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030662</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030662</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030661</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030661</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030660</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030660</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030659</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030659</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030658</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030658</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030657</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030657</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>koffeenkreame41-1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 16, 2016 05:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd never say ANY of the sequels is the best. The original film is still the best. But I do think that this film, III, is the best SEQUEL.<br />
Agreed, even though I loved Saw II.<br />
"I'm the ultimate badass,you do NOT wanna f-ck wit me!"Hudson,Aliens</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030656</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030656</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hnt_dnl</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 08, 2013 05:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd never say ANY of the sequels is the best. The original film is still the best. But I do think that this film, III, is the best SEQUEL.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030655</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030655</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HamsterRecon</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 08, 2013 03:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Saw II is way better than Saw III! I love Saw II and it is one of my favorite films along with the first and Saw III is just such a disappointment in comparison. I still think it is good, just not great like the others. I wouldn't say it is as bad as Saw V though<br />
Signature.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030654</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030654</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>deepcovergecko</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 24, 2013 03:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">There both equally the same in my book. Part 1 is and always will be the best!<br />
Snootchie Bootchie</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030653</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030653</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hans_warwarina</strong> — <em>14 years ago(January 18, 2012 05:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Better than 2 definitely. Just watched em both today and 2 was pretty lame in comparison to 3. Although i can't say 3 was THAT great either, but if i have to compare both, 3 was much better than 2 that's my 2c</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030652</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030652</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NeonManiac0</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 29, 2010 01:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Nope, Saw III is by far the worst Saw IMO, although Saw VII isn't far behind.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030651</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030651</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Mordred92</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 27, 2010 12:46 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well I watched Saw II the other day and didn't think much of it at all- I much preferred the first- but I just watched Saw III and I liked it a hell of a lot more than Saw II! It was great and kept me interested the whole time. I still like the first best so far though</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030650</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030650</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Zog6661</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 25, 2010 07:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Saw II is great and all, but the fact that it's rated so much higher than III on this site is absolutely mind-boggling to me.<br />
F_CK<br />
OFF<br />
CHELI<br />
F_cking<br />
OS</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030649</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030649</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Much Better than Saw II on Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>obsessedmovies</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 22, 2010 08:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I disagree. Saw II is extremely underrated, and deserves a lot more credit.<br />
Team Jill<br />
This isn't what John wanted.<br />
You chose this.</p>
<ul>
<li>Saw IV</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030648</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2030648</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:09:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>