<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Na&#x27;vis Alien vs rather &#x27;native&#x27; life?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Avatar</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>dblake78250</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 15, 2017 06:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The land animals appeared to have six, maybe more, legs. Yet the Na'vis kind do not follow that simple trait. In fact they seemed rather mammalian (ie breasts), if not a genetic human facsimile, with some blue melanin and a long monkeyish tail.<br />
Is this similarity supposed to provide us viewers human brotherhood with the Na'vis? Otherwise who feels sympathy for a cockroach?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/242537/na-vis-alien-vs-rather-native-life</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:10:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/242537.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 21:12:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>