<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It needs to be rebooted with a taller and better suited actor, possibly as a tv series, in (possibly?) chronological ord]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jack Reacher</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>zard110111</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 07, 2016 05:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It needs to be rebooted with a taller and better suited actor, possibly as a tv series, in (possibly?) chronological order (aligned with the books in episode arc format would be nice). This was an alright movie, but its not what such a fantastic series of books deserves. Now that the sequels out, please kill it and try again.<br />
Please.<br />
<em>beep</em> please. This is hollywood <em>beep</em> at its best.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/242985/it-needs-to-be-rebooted-with-a-taller-and-better-suited-actor-possibly-as-a-tv-series-in-possibly-chronological-ord</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:38:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/242985.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 22:44:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>