<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[felt abit 70s Dirty Harry]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jack Reacher</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>bozo_500</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 25, 2016 05:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">the opening with the sniper, the way its all shot/looks like a 70s thriller</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/242990/felt-abit-70s-dirty-harry</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 15:05:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/242990.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 22:44:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to felt abit 70s Dirty Harry on Mon, 04 May 2026 22:44:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Movie_Riggs</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 03, 2016 06:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Though a Dirty Harry movie would have much less dialogue, I can see how its shot like a 70s thriller. No complaints there. We need more old fashioned movies these days.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2038139</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2038139</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 22:44:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>