<![CDATA[Great idea for a movie, bad execution (No Spoilers)]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Transsiberian

haynese_98 — 15 years ago(November 14, 2010 07:07 AM)

Wow, it just looks like they're going through the motions in this movie. They could have done so much better. Kingsley is excellent as always but Mortimer and Harrelson are poorly cast. It had only a $15,000,000 budget so that explains a lot.
I know I'm rambling but I just want to express my disappointment with this movie and they certainly had a very promising premise, they just didn't make it all click. 6.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243117/great-idea-for-a-movie-bad-execution-no-spoilersRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 18:27:00 GMTMon, 04 May 2026 23:19:43 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Great idea for a movie, bad execution (No Spoilers) on Mon, 04 May 2026 23:19:45 GMT]]>maximusveritas — 11 years ago(September 26, 2014 11:11 AM)

Yes, I was really looking forward to seeing it given the acting talent, director, and premise, but it ended up being one of the worst movies I've seen in a while. 2/10.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2039848https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2039848Mon, 04 May 2026 23:19:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Great idea for a movie, bad execution (No Spoilers) on Mon, 04 May 2026 23:19:44 GMT]]>zeladsaladdd — 13 years ago(August 14, 2012 02:31 AM)

"Only" $15,000,000?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2039847https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2039847Mon, 04 May 2026 23:19:44 GMT