<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Paul Weston 50?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — In Treatment</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>trtrtr-1</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 09, 2015 09:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why say that PW was 50 in season one? Was this vanity on the part of GB? He was obviously much older. Not that he wasn't attractive or anything He was just so obviously older that it seemed ridiculous.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243300/paul-weston-50</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 01:16:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243300.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 23:44:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Paul Weston 50? on Mon, 04 May 2026 23:44:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SheLeppie</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 23, 2015 07:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">He's a decade older in real life.  He looks his age too, but Hollywood usually makes characters younger than their real life counterparts.<br />
I simply am not there</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2041044</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2041044</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 23:44:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>