<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I&#x27;ve never been able to figure out why it looks so flat and uninspired. The same DP shot Godzilla and that looked miles]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Avengers</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Sebastian_B</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 04, 2017 02:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've never been able to figure out why it looks so flat and uninspired. The same DP shot Godzilla and that looked miles better. Joss Whedon made Serenity for $40 million and that looked way more cinematic. Why was River's fight in the bar so much better choreographed and shot than any of Black Widow's action scenes?<br />
Was it because production had to be relatively tight? The extensive use of green-screen to replicate an entire city? I dunnoBen Davis did great work on Age of Ultron, as well as GotG and Doctor Strange, so maybe it was just a matter of the right production team.<br />
But yeah, c'mon, the cinematography in this sucked. Luckily the film's charm, chemistry, and novelty outshined it, just.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243390/i-ve-never-been-able-to-figure-out-why-it-looks-so-flat-and-uninspired-the-same-dp-shot-godzilla-and-that-looked-miles</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 18:58:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243390.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 23:59:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>