<![CDATA[And why]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Inside

aussieboy1982 — 10 years ago(March 09, 2016 12:55 AM)

And why

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243491/and-whyRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 16:15:23 GMTTue, 05 May 2026 00:26:30 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to And why on Tue, 05 May 2026 00:26:34 GMT]]>prplayer — 9 years ago(November 10, 2016 01:17 PM)

3/10 too dark to see anything
so many movies, so little time

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043096https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043096Tue, 05 May 2026 00:26:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to And why on Tue, 05 May 2026 00:26:33 GMT]]>baxterrocky — 9 years ago(August 17, 2016 08:40 PM)

I watched it last night for the first time after reading a lot about this film over the years.
It surpassed my expectations.
I would rate it a 9/10.
Performances, the way it was shot, atmosphere, gruesome gore, ticked all the boxes. Definitely a step up form the usual slasher fare. This was unique and different.
A brilliant film!!!
Mr Annnderson..!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043095https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043095Tue, 05 May 2026 00:26:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to And why on Tue, 05 May 2026 00:26:32 GMT]]>taticat — 9 years ago(July 14, 2016 09:44 PM)

3/10 almost completely because of its lame AF plot. After all that, to find out the 'why' was what it was (trying to avoid spoilers here) was so incredibly disappointing that I was, frankly, completely pissed the hell off.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043094https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043094Tue, 05 May 2026 00:26:32 GMT