<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[My cyborg theory]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Inside</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Schnitz1</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 01, 2014 02:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The most logical explanation of the movie is that La Femme was a cyborg all the time. That's how she was able to singlehanded take care of every cop that got into the house. When she got out of the closet (no pun intended) near the end after getting burnt, you can clearly see how she looks cyborg and that's the reason she could go on interacting despite her injuries. This is also explained by Sarah when telling her "they said noone survived". That means La Femme did indeed die in the car accident, but was revived into a cyborg in a French government experiment.<br />
This cyborg was meant to become a new weapon against the ongoing suburban riots. However, the human part within her was what made the cyborg experiment to eventually backfire. Some of her stronger human feelings were still present and she got obsessed with stalking Sarah and taking over her baby.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243556/my-cyborg-theory</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:17:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243556.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:39:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My cyborg theory on Tue, 05 May 2026 00:39:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>baphomet1313</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 04, 2015 06:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And the main character's name is Sarah.Clearly a Terminator reference! <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":P" alt="😛" /><br />
This is me.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/25450947/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/25450947/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043714</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043714</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:39:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My cyborg theory on Tue, 05 May 2026 00:39:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheBeardedWonder</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 01, 2014 10:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So this robot has lungs and is able to breath in with them? Interesting. The no survivors thing is explained by the beginning of the line 'they said', clearly the doctors or cops or whoever were wrong.<br />
I mean i'm up for interpretations and new ideas, but you can't just throw out anything you want because it works for ONE scene. If it makes 1% make sense but 99% not, then it's pretty obvious it can be put to bed as incorrect<br />
"What? Do you wanna just sit around and be wrong?" - Liz Lemon</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043713</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043713</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:39:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My cyborg theory on Tue, 05 May 2026 00:39:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mistermaddog</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 29, 2014 05:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love this <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /> It can also be supported by her sudden outbursts of emotions when she gets hurt etc. Her human side is trying to come out.<br />
The smoking part is because she is trying to communicate with her human part, trying not to forget it.<br />
Very creative reading of the movie. Although this is not my primary view of the film, it certainly is a fun one.<br />
"They said there were no survivors" line was probably put in sloppily. There are no explanations for that and the script is nowhere near perfect nor the filmmaking in general when this movie is concerned. So I shrug it off as a mistake.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043712</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043712</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:39:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to My cyborg theory on Tue, 05 May 2026 00:39:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheBeardedWonder</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 27, 2014 07:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This is a joke post right? Has to be. Why would a cyborg need to smoke cigarettes?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043711</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2043711</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:39:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>