<![CDATA[$35 million budget?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Lions for Lambs

spookyrat1 — 13 years ago(April 02, 2013 06:05 AM)

Interesting to see that a movie with the majority of its scenes shot in a pair of offices had such a big budget. (About 150% greater than The Hurt Locker!)Hope it didn't just go on a big salary bill.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243869/35-million-budgetRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 19:00:38 GMTTue, 05 May 2026 01:39:57 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to $35 million budget? on Tue, 05 May 2026 01:40:00 GMT]]>Blubonnet_Spearman — 9 years ago(May 19, 2016 11:29 AM)

Considering the stars and other talent involved, 35 million is very efficient

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2046685https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2046685Tue, 05 May 2026 01:40:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to $35 million budget? on Tue, 05 May 2026 01:39:58 GMT]]>ndenton-1 — 10 years ago(May 05, 2015 11:43 PM)

Redford, Cruise and Streep must have been paid 10 million each. The rest went into the propaganda budget (To buy off the critics).

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2046684https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2046684Tue, 05 May 2026 01:39:58 GMT