<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[because that is EXACTLY the route of MGM:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Lions for Lambs</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>gcarras</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 14, 2015 10:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">because that is EXACTLY the route of MGM:<br />
Roaring self-distributed to other studio-dependent lambs.<br />
And even though they still were distributing their own <em>beep</em> MGM, sadly, just wasn't what their own Louis B.Mayer had wanted for them:<br />
"The Tiffany's of Hollywood A studios..with more stars than there are in heaven"(Meanwhile, frequent partner Columbia has experienced the Cinderella story compared to their Depression era status/.with all due respect to everyone)<br />
Amanda Bynes is hot and Lindsay Lohan is not.<br />
Profile pic: Courtney Thorne-Smith.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243894/because-that-is-exactly-the-route-of-mgm</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 18:40:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/243894.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 01:46:23 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>