<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Are the Project Veritas videos credible?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Game of Thrones</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>TheSinfulPoster</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 22, 2016 07:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">O'keefe's a convicted criminal. But the content is virtually impossible to distort enough for it to make a big deal.<br />
Believe me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/245748/are-the-project-veritas-videos-credible</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 18:08:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/245748.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jesus_texas_ranger</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 25, 2016 02:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">ENOUGH SAID.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066462</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066462</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>don savant</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 25, 2016 02:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wow you are an idiot.  Typical.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066461</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066461</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jesus_texas_ranger</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 25, 2016 01:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">JAYWALKING THEN JAYWALKING DOES NOT EXIST. YET EVERYWHERE YOU GO YOU SEE IT. WHY WOULD THE PEOPLE THAT BENEFIT FROM THE CRIME INVESTIGATE IT? BETTER QUESTION. WHY AM I ASKING YOUR DUMBASS? THAT QUESTION NEVER WOULD HAVE COME ACROSS YOUR SAD LITTLE MIND.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066460</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066460</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>don savant</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 25, 2016 10:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Some people got fired, so I would say yes.  It is a much smaller scale than they are blowing it up to be.   There have only been<br />
31 real voter fraud cases out of 1 BILLION<br />
in general elections.  Do the math.  Not enough to even make a fraction of an impact.  Electoral votes can be bought and should be investigated!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066459</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066459</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheSinfulPoster</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 25, 2016 10:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Brits are all dead silent on this.<br />
Believe me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066458</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066458</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Discerningly-Tasteless</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 07:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was pro-Bernie until he sold out to Hillary. Now I'm voting for Trump. if he didn't sell out, I would not vote at all. Very sad.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066457</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066457</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheSinfulPoster</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 04:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Based on income, he is literally "in the 4%" of top earners. And he owns a f-cking $600,000 vacation home in addition to two others. And he's endorsed and is campaigning for a woman he has denounced in every way, and whose platform and (public) persona is the diametric opposite of his platform and (public) person. Evidently, they have a tremendous amount in common, so I get it now. He's a smooth liar.<br />
after he knew he couldn't win,<br />
He could have won had these revelations about how HRC's campaign manipulated the nomination process been brought to light.<br />
I think he saw the lesser of two eavis to be Hillary, therefore in his own mind he was serving his supporters by endorsing what he saw to be the next best option.<br />
How, specifically, is she the lesser of two evils? She's a client of the investment banks Sanders claimed "rigged" the economy to "buy elections." She is the embodiment of everything he claimed to oppose  before he flipped and became a sellout and bought a THIRD HOUSE<br />
And he is in the 4%. Maybe next year, with book sales and from speeches, he'll become part of the 1%. What a guy.<br />
Believe me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066456</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066456</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheIronThrone</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 04:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Buying a house doesn't reflect on his sincerity. As far as selling out his supporters, after he knew he couldn't win, I think he saw the lesser of two eavis to be Hillary, therefore in his own mind he was serving his supporters by endorsing what he saw to be the next best option.<br />
"We find our true friends on the battlefield." - Jon Snow</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066455</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066455</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheSinfulPoster</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 02:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Newsflash: All campaigns are run this way except Sanders. That's why he lost.<br />
Yeah, Bernie Sanders is a real sincere guy. Love how he sold out his supporters and bought a third vacation house.<br />
Believe me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066454</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066454</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SunnyWays</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 02:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Newsflash: All campaigns are run this way except Sanders.<br />
No, that's not correct. and if there's something to the allegations then there should be an accounting for that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066453</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066453</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheIronThrone</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 04:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree, it should not be acceptable.<br />
"We find our true friends on the battlefield." - Jon Snow</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066452</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066452</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SunnyWays</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 03:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And Throne, any of that mangey immoral activity and extortion should be acceptable? No.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066451</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066451</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheSinfulPoster</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 02:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Believe me,<br />
You can't produce any evidence supporting this about my campaign, lying partisan cuck. But you do look comfortable on your knees.<br />
Believe me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066450</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066450</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheIronThrone</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 02:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That was only a neutral statement about campaign corruption in the country.<br />
Yes.<br />
Believe me, if you were party to the inner workingso fthe Trump campaign, or the Bush campaign, or any other campaign, this would be a small thing.<br />
When H. Ross Perot was ahead in the polls v. Clinton and Bush in the '90s, Bush Sr.'s campaign hired people to obtain nude photos of his daughter engaging in sex acts and threatened to release them unless he withdrew from the race, thinking Bush had a better chance to beat Clinton than Perot.<br />
Perot withdrew because he was already a billionaire, and only ran because people liked his platform. Campign corruption is how legitimate independent candidacy died.<br />
"We find our true friends on the battlefield." - Jon Snow</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066449</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066449</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Studly Studmoar</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 01:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No, that's the very problem with the [lack of] coverage concerning these videos. Too many people dismiss them with that mentality; "Oh, corruption is corruption, it's just politics"  This neglects the caliber of corruption we're not only taking for granted, but outright seeing to be a proven reality.<br />
It's like if it came out that Hillary eats children, with everyone saying "Well yeah, we've joked about that forever, it's hardly a surprise."  No, she<br />
literally<br />
eats children.<br />
I mean, it's really no surprise that liberals aren't reacting to this. Political agenda aside, they can't seem to grasp the difference between allegation and conjecture versus confessed, proven intent to commit criminal activity. Sure, we all assume the worst. But it's an entirely different level we're playing on when the worst is no longer just assumption.<br />
Yet Hillary's media would much rather cover<br />
allegations<br />
of groping women. They might as well just publish a million articles about how Trump blew up the moon, contributed money to Hitler, and created AIDS to kill all the blacks and gays. There's clearly no standard of credibility in journalism anymore.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066448</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066448</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DeplorableAlexRomer</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 01:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not all campaigns are corrupt to anything approaching that extent. Clinton's campaign has broken several laws and gotten police and citizens injured. This is not typical of the country as a wholeit is waaaay over the line.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066447</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066447</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Boundeem</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 01:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That was only a neutral statement about campaign corruption in the country.<br />
Who reads to you?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066446</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066446</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DeplorableAlexRomer</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 01:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">All campaigns pay people to incite violence?<br />
All campaigns bus people across state lines to commit voter fraud on a massive scale? All campaigns plot how to let illegal aliens vote?<br />
Wowwhat country do you live in? Certainly not one that believes in democracy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066445</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066445</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheIronThrone</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 23, 2016 01:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Newsflash: All campaigns are run this way except Sanders. That's why he lost.<br />
"We find our true friends on the battlefield." - Jon Snow</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066444</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066444</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DeplorableAlexRomer</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 22, 2016 10:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, they are reliable.<br />
He pled guilty to a misdemeanorentering under false pretenses.  He pretended to be a telephone repairman to gain accessin my view, that does not make him<br />
untrustworthy. Context matters.<br />
Two people were quickly firedthis strongly suggests the tapes are legit.<br />
Some of this is backed up by wikileaks and various election filingsso there is other evidence.<br />
Finallylong segments are uncut and make it impossible to mislead through selective editing.<br />
ETA: he is releasing another video Mondaysupposedly it will directly implicate Donna Brazile and Hillarybut we'll see.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066443</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066443</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Are the Project Veritas videos credible? on Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jesus_texas_ranger</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 22, 2016 10:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">OF COURSE THEY ARE ALL CREDIBLE. IF THEY WEREN'T YOU WOULDN'T HAVE SEEN THE GUYS ON THE TAPE BE IMMEDIATELY FIRED AND DISAPPEAR OFF THE FACE OF THE PLANET.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066442</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2066442</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:32:16 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>