<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It was simply wrong to show suspects being questioned without either legal representation or having rejected legal repre]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Inspector Lynley Mysteries</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Andrew_S_Hatton</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 30, 2015 10:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It was simply wrong to show suspects being questioned without either legal representation or having rejected legal representation.<br />
That changed long ago and a very false impression is given.<br />
When it happens now it is done casually and away from formal interview situations - but is still illegal</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/246016/it-was-simply-wrong-to-show-suspects-being-questioned-without-either-legal-representation-or-having-rejected-legal-repre</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:31:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/246016.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:39:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>