<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Graphic female nudity]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Wolf of Wall Street</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>gra05</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 31, 2015 09:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I always see men complaining on the internet about how mainstream movies that show female genitals are very rare and instead usually just show pubic hair. They then list the movie or movies that can be counted on one hand or one finger that actually show female genitals.  I am surprised they never mention this one. That scene near the end where the blonde does the naked dance for the Swiss guy is borderline pornographic. No, it doesn't actually show her vagina, but her hair is cut in a way that is shows a little too much for an R rating. I was shocked. Thank goodness that was the only scene I noticed. Even the scenes that had fully shaved women didn't show vaginas due to distance from the camera and positioning of legs.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/246159/graphic-female-nudity</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 04:56:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/246159.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:59:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fjk1138-731-161881</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 26, 2017 09:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Nudity is a part of life.  People need to grow up.<br />
Personally, I found the scene where the lady agrees to shave her head for money to be more degrading than any nudity could possibly be.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070699</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070699</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mikko-sandt</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 14, 2017 12:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That scene near the end where the blonde does the naked dance for the Swiss guy is borderline pornographic. No, it doesn't actually show her vagina, but her hair is cut in a way that is shows a little too much for an R rating. I was shocked.<br />
You were shocked at what exactly? That scene could have been sub-PG 13. All it showed was a pair of boobs and a vagina from an angle where absolutely no details could be seen.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070698</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070698</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 07:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You have issues.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070697</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070697</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 07:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Men are more visually stimulated than women are.  Men respond to the more graphic displays while women are more responsive to the romance/emotional aspect of sexuality.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070696</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070696</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 19, 2017 07:50 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh and I forgot another point! Look at all the documentaries that show vaginas during childbirth!!! I was watching one on Netflix and was shocked that the woman didn't demand for her genitals to be blurred out.<br />
Not every woman is as uptight as you are.<br />
The birthing scene was one minor part of the film and therefore the genitals were unexpected and unnecessary.<br />
Yeah!  How dare they show the birthing process in a documentary about the birthing process?!?!<br />
It seems women have to deal with their privates no longer being private when they are giving birth<br />
Thank you, Capt. Obvious.<br />
I can't think of any situations where penises are normalized for public viewing in the same way.<br />
Hmmm, you know what?  I can't either.  It is almost like babies don't get birthed out of a  penis.<br />
A bigger issue you should have is all of these women who are being forced to give birth for public viewing.  I guess my wife was lucky that she had our children in a private room at a hospital.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070695</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070695</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>gra05</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 04, 2017 10:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh and I forgot another point! Look at all the documentaries that show vaginas during childbirth!!! I was watching one on Netflix and was shocked that the woman didn't demand for her genitals to be blurred out. The birthing scene was one minor part of the film and therefore the genitals were unexpected and unnecessary. They have shown such stuff on regular tv and in high school classrooms also. It seems women have to deal with their privates no longer being private when they are giving birth, but I can't think of any situations where penises are normalized for public viewing in the same way.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070694</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070694</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>gra05</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 04, 2017 09:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh and I forgot to mention the most offensive thing of all in my above list. For the longest time, pornographic images of women were all over the pages of magazines in bookstores. Similar magazines of men were rare. I think now with the internet and maybe before with the porno film, things have gotten more equal, but for the longest time, female genitalia was more accessible to look at than male. I find it offensive that men find it offensive that R rated movies rarely show quick flashes of penises. Seriously, what is there to complain about???<br />
I could talk about strip clubs too. Do men even take their bottoms off when stripping in the few such clubs that exist? Women do it enough, but yet men STILL complain about how so many clubs are topless only. Get over yourselves please.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070693</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070693</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>gra05</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 04, 2017 09:22 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You are missing the point. You men focus on ONE aspect that isn't fair, and that is that you claim men's sex organs are seen more. Isn't that mostly a matter of men having more obvious genitals? I don't think either should be shown in mainstream movies, but if we are arguing that the human body is "natural" and "innocent", which a lot of you like to argue, then the natural and innocent way to show it is a man's penis hanging for a few seconds from a distance while for a woman the equivalent would be pubic hair , or, if you must, a shaved vagina from a distance for a few seconds where you don't see anything anyways.<br />
This is why I don't understand your arguments. In order to show female genitalia you have to get up close and personal and pornographic. Either you guys want "natural" nudity in movies like you argue for, which is shown equally anyways, or you shut up about it and watch a porno. Plain and simple.<br />
As for it not being "fair" that a penis is more obvious to the eye than a vagina in a "natural" non porn nudity setting, well, let me share a list of examples of how things are more unfair for women, but nobody complains about it ever<br />
-Genitalia or not, women's pubic regions have always been shown more than men's in many movies for decades now. For you to not act like pubic hair down there isn't private in itself is pretty obnoxious to me.<br />
-Even back during conservative times of the past, women have walked around showing more than men. Watch movies from the 50s and before. Women show their legs from the knees down and are more likely to expose their arms and upper chests.for men that NEVER happened unless at the beach.<br />
-Women now show a lot more than men do at the beach ever since the bikini came out, and bikinis are more likely to fall off whereas men's trunks have secure drawstrings. I can't believe people let their little girls wear that garbage when they are playing in the waves. Which sex of any age is more likely to have a wardrobe malfunction at the beach? Which sex is more likely to reveal private part outlines when their swimsuits are wet?<br />
-Women for years have had to deal with going to male obgyns and everyone acts like they should shut up and deal with it. Men make the biggest fuss over female nurses examining them and talk as if women should be banned from seeing naked men when working in the hospital. This was even apparent in a lot of older movies, but yet again, men delivering babies was perfectly normal.<br />
-On playgrounds or even at church, men constantly see the panties of little girls when they are wearing dresses and playing or even just sitting down. Little boys have   never had the same issue.<br />
-It is okay for women to bring boys into female restrooms and changing areas, but little girls are never allowed to see grown men undressing or going to the bathroom.<br />
I could go further but will stop there. Don't lecture women on how an occasional quick flash of a penis in an R rated movie, isn't fair please</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070692</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070692</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>justanicknamed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 14, 2016 06:52 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Female nudity is EVERYWHERE,<br />
Which is it?  Are women's breasts naked or natural?  Should they free the nipple or cover them up?  If a woman is walking around in public topless is she exposing herself or is she just staying cool?<br />
Seeing naked males doesn't bother me, but it is a point that, in few cases, we don't see the same amount of a woman's reproductive organ as we do a man's.  We usually just see her pubic hair (or a merkin).  That is the point which bothers a lot of people.  If it were equal, we'd see vulva and all.<br />
Personally, I think most nudity in main-stream movies is stupid.  Most of it is done for ratings and has nothing to do with the story.  The opposite is true as well.  How many movies do we see where a couple is in bed after sex and the woman makes sure to hold the covers in place so her breast can't be seen?  I get it if she's covering up because she's cold, but she's got it covering just her breasts and we can still see cleavage, the top of her chest and her shoulders all exposed to the cold.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070691</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070691</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kayleighlaylaparker</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 13, 2016 05:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I do shave but only when I have a partner (and even them not always).<br />
IMO it's uncomfortable and unhygienic. Going natural feels better. Plus regular shaving gives you sore red bumps.<br />
Also totally agree about men complaining when they see male nudity. Female nudity is EVERYWHERE, all the time. Male nudity is rare. Get over it men.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070690</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070690</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>snafu-889-869764</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 22, 2016 03:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">zzzzzz</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070689</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070689</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Monknificent</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 05, 2016 07:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">@ OP gra05:<br />
You were shocked? You were shocked by a few frames of a nicely trimmed lady garden of a pretty woman, shown in a tasteful wide angle? It's not as if the camera zoomed into her crotch and nestled right into her mini-bush! It wasn't even specifically highlighted/signposted, a la Sharon Stone in the famous Basic Instinct uncrossing legs scene!<br />
Or were you shocked by the final frames of the scene where she jumps into bed, her legs go up and are ever so slightly open, giving us a full (albeit somewhat dimly lit) flash of her actual undercarriage? The ACTUAL LABIA?<br />
OMG! Where on earth could one see such a thing these days? Oh, that's right, on literally THOUSANDS of easily accessible porn sites, a single click away.<br />
God, I so hope you missed that, and can now go back and see it, and be ULTRA-outraged all over again. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.<br />
"It's too late Always has been, always will be<br />
Too late."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070688</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070688</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Monknificent</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 05, 2016 08:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hahaha! Great point, well made.<br />
When I was 14-15 in the early 90s and there was hardly any internet porn to speak of, and pretty much none involving moving pictures, or certainly none that was watchable, and if you had access to the web in its infancy (I did not) it would take half a minute for one PHOTO to load up and slowly reveal itself to you on dial-up, I did in fact keep a mental record of all the more erotic and sexy scenes in mainstream films, as those were my main source of free sexytimes. Perfectly understandable. And when one of these treasured films would come on the telly, in popped the blank VHS tape, then very carefully put the recorder into Rec-Pause mode to avoid the horrendously loud clunking of the machine's start-stop mode, so as not to alert the parental units to my nefarious doings!<br />
Aaah, those were the days! Damn, those VHS machines were loud - and slow! I missed many a start of a scene that way! The youth of today don't know how good they have it, and never will - well, at least not until Trump puts the entire planet back into the stone age and teenage boys will have to make do with cave drawings.<br />
"It's too late Always has been, always will be<br />
Too late."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070687</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070687</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>info-655-196140</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 19, 2016 10:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You see men complaining about movies not showing vaginas? I'd recommend you stop hanging out in places where teenage boys congregate. I'm a guy, 90% of the people I associate with are guys, I've talked to 1000's of guys about all kinds of things, honestly, nobody gives a <em>beep</em> about vaginas in movies.<br />
I don't think I can list a single movie that shows a vagina, including this movie, that's because I don't remember or categorise nude scenes in movies, because I'm an adult.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070686</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070686</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Venus As A Boy</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 31, 2016 05:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't know why anybody would value a movie more or less because of its redundancy or lack of nudity (violence, rude language, ). A movie should use these syntactical devices to help portray a better experience for the audience.<br />
If you want to see more nudity watch an adult film. If you get upset about it (and are old enough) grow up and expand your horizon.<br />
I agree with you that getting rid of pubic hair is not natural, but neither is wearing shoes natural. Still, if you go out barefoot you might get looked at as being crazy. There are hundreds of other examples I could list (organ transplantation, using soap, wearing clothes all together, using any technical device (yes, I know, there are animals that use and build tools in wilderness), ).<br />
This is a question of morality and it makes no sense to begin such an argument on such an internet board.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070685</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070685</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheCommenteer</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 22, 2016 06:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">despite reading this rubbish, I'm yet to work out what your point is. You're just crapping on, seemingly endlessly, about nudity. What's your point?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070684</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070684</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Daimaju</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 22, 2016 02:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was shocked.<br />
Ahahahahahaha Americans</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070683</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070683</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>moviefan098</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 23, 2016 05:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">lol what in the fck are you talking about? men never complain about that. women are the one that can't stop crying about men seeing a tit here and there in movies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070682</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070682</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Monknificent</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 05, 2016 09:22 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think this fella is a chick.<br />
"It's too late Always has been, always will be<br />
Too late."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070681</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070681</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>inko94</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 18, 2016 08:46 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Listen Fella before watching a movie check the ratings by MPAA and if it the scene were shocking to you just watch Nickelodeon movies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070680</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070680</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jajceboy</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 17, 2016 11:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh great, another American being offended about nudity!<br />
European movies have had graphic nudity, both male and female, for ages without the rating being high. It all depends on the situation. People walking around naked won't necessarily give you the highest rating, unless it's a specific case.<br />
I don't know about other countries, but here in Sweden Wolf got 15- rating which is the highest rating. As was the case in U.K, I believe.<br />
But a film like the Reader, for instance was rated "children-approved" which would correspond to G-rated. Meaning that the whole family could watch it together. Tough I wouldn't recommend it..<br />
It's all a matter of context and how it fits the story.<br />
Nudity has been prominent in Europe for ages. It's not until recently that America has cached up on it.<br />
Nudity isn't really that big of a deal. We are really liberal about that. We are far more concerned about movies with violent content than showing piece of skin. it's not like children will take any harm of seeing a naked body.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070679</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070679</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:00:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 09:59:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rtlh1982</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 10, 2016 08:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">While trying to watch this I wondered where the line is now between R and NC-17.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070678</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070678</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:59:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 09:59:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Foxbarking</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 30, 2016 08:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070677</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070677</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:59:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Graphic female nudity on Tue, 05 May 2026 09:59:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Monknificent</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 05, 2016 07:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">BOOM.<br />
Mic drop.<br />
"It's too late Always has been, always will be<br />
Too late."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070676</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2070676</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:59:57 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>