<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[1 point for the chick in the green tops boobies. The thing worth watching in this wretched rip-off.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Monster</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>corgi37</strong> — <em>14 years ago(April 15, 2011 05:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">1 point for the chick in the green tops boobies. The thing worth watching in this wretched rip-off.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247388/1-point-for-the-chick-in-the-green-tops-boobies-the-thing-worth-watching-in-this-wretched-rip-off</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:24:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247388.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:26:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1 point for the chick in the green tops boobies. The thing worth watching in this wretched rip-off. on Tue, 05 May 2026 14:26:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2083215</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2083215</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:26:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1 point for the chick in the green tops boobies. The thing worth watching in this wretched rip-off. on Tue, 05 May 2026 14:26:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Woodyanders</strong> — <em>1 month ago(February 25, 2026 12:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The two gals both had nice cleavage, but that's it as far as saying anything remotely good about this ****ty movie.<br />
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2083214</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2083214</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:26:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1 point for the chick in the green tops boobies. The thing worth watching in this wretched rip-off. on Tue, 05 May 2026 14:26:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sized-2</strong> — <em>14 years ago(July 08, 2011 04:21 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've seen much worse. I will take your 2 and raise it to 4. I love big monster movies. Cloverfield made me sick with the camera shake, this one was better. But the worse thing is they pretend its real, even using the 2 girls fake names as their real ones on IMDB like was done with The Fourth Kind. And you even go to the girl in green's website (<a href="http://www.sarahlieving.com/resume.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.sarahlieving.com/resume.html</a>) where she has her resume and she doesn't list the film, like its in her contract to not mention she worked on it. Weird.<br />
My Blu-ray Collection  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yat3zka" rel="nofollow ugc">http://tinyurl.com/yat3zka</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2083213</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2083213</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:26:14 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>