<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Would of served the movie better if had no ties to the Cloverfield brand and in&#x27;t have that ending]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — 10 Cloverfield Lane</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>anthonyhall86</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 31, 2017 06:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Would of served the movie better if had no ties to the Cloverfield brand and in't have that ending</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247786/would-of-served-the-movie-better-if-had-no-ties-to-the-cloverfield-brand-and-in-t-have-that-ending</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 01:02:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247786.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Would of served the movie better if had no ties to the Cloverfield brand and in&#x27;t have that ending on Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Sequentialist</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 05, 2017 12:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why?<br />
Do you have a reason?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086065</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086065</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>