<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Brits: thought on the 12A rating?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — 10 Cloverfield Lane</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>PizzicatoFishCrouch</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 20, 2017 12:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I did a 'Review of the BBFC in 2016' post and reflected on their best and worst decisions in 2016. I personally thought<br />
10 Cloverfield Lane<br />
should have been a 15, not a 12A:<br />
<a href="http://zummer.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/the-oscars-and-razzies-for-bbfc-2016.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://zummer.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/the-oscars-and-razzies-for-bbfc-2016.html</a><br />
What did you think? Did you see anyone in the audience younger than 12, and if so, how did the film affect them?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247787/brits-thought-on-the-12a-rating</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:25:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247787.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Brits: thought on the 12A rating? on Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Sequentialist</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 05, 2017 12:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's consistent with the way other movies have been rated in the past.<br />
It feels like a 12A. Whether an under 12 really is unready to see it I don't know though. Pretty brutal for them I'd think but not traumatizing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086069</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086069</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Brits: thought on the 12A rating? on Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>liverpool26</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 31, 2017 05:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">12 or pg.<br />
There was no difference between this and war of the world's. We don't see any violence, I didn't hear any swearing nor did I see any sex. The most violent scene was someone being shot OFF SCREEN we don't actually see anything.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086068</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086068</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Brits: thought on the 12A rating? on Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bozo_500</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 28, 2017 07:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just watched it without looking at the certificate on the cover and thought it'd be a 15 as very intense, shocking, horror (but PG13 in states as not enough swearing) normally PG13 equals 12A but sometimes is a 15.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086067</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086067</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:30:08 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>