<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Not bad for a horror…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Triangle</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>branwese</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 28, 2016 09:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I somehow missed it when it came out.<br />
7/10</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247824/not-bad-for-a-horror</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 19:16:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247824.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:46:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Not bad for a horror… on Tue, 05 May 2026 15:46:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Matthew T. Dalldorf</strong> — <em>6 months ago(September 07, 2025 12:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Man, you need to start watching good horror movies; check out The Babadook, Werewolf of London, Ginger Snaps, May, The Wicker Man ('73), Sisters and I Walked With a Zombie. That'll be a good start.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086810</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2086810</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:46:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>