<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Same story, different take.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Triangle</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Sqeegee</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 22, 2016 09:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This is not an explanation of Triangle. Rather, an observation of how diligent creativity often works and to what extent I interpret the gears that turn the wheel behind creation.<br />
I rarely read reviews before watching a movie. Primarily, I use my instinct which helps me absorb a fresh and better impact without exterior influences that might sway my personal perception. In the case of Triangle I had no idea what the film consisted of, only something of a daunting narrative.<br />
I honestly cant remember the number of films like this Ive watched. Of course having an atheistic background there are a lot of things I dont subscribe to, yet I often enjoy these tales only to see how they are played out. Starting with the atypical storm, I caught onto the usual anomaly factor often used as a gateway to propel an impending event. I thought to myself, Well, lets see where this goes?<br />
Generally, writers of this genre, leave an open ending with a choice of possibilities. In this case they opted for a loop. With loops there is no beginning nor end, so in essence you have a story of a story, whereby it is possible to start at any given sequence then go back and play up to that point.<br />
Writers also have complete power to do whatever they want. Actually many people are involved: adding, subtracting, inserting, suggesting, even to the level of knowingly creating errors to gain a desired effect. All of this can be seam-blended on the table or editing room. Like other films of this nature, I got the impression Triangle was another leave-it-to-the-audience type of movie. There are a lot interpretations which is good for a film and now that I have watched it, I really enjoy reading them!<br />
Regardless of how a person views a film, it should be kept in mind its about entertainment. Thus, going back to the beginning, I offer these movies some slack. Theyre resourceful in the area of pretend. The,<br />
Oh, I see<br />
. factor depends on the craftsmanship behind it. Triangle was fairly resourceful. Ive seen better and Ive seen worse. But the key ingredient on both sides of the screen, is imagination.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247894/same-story-different-take</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:03:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/247894.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:57:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>