<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[How it should have ended…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Law Abiding Citizen</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ralph_2ndedition</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 16, 2015 12:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So, a lot of people are disappointed with the illogical part of Clyde leaving the tunnels unguarded - and thereby allowing himself to be outsmarted.<br />
And I agree.<br />
Here's what I feel would fix that, and a few other illogical things:<br />
Clyde does his thing at City Hall, cops do theirs - they find the bomb, they realize it's a huge friggin' super bomb that will take out several floors, BUT it is booby trapped and can't be moved. Also - because Clyde is so clever - they are unable to disarm it.<br />
Basically they all just sit there, waiting.<br />
All except Nick, who rushes back to the prison.<br />
Clyde returns to his cell, via the tunnels, and after closing the door behind him he says, still with his back to the rest of the cell:<br />
"Hello, Nick. I'm glad you're here."<br />
Nick steps out from the shadows - NOT armed, annoyed that Clyde knew he was there. The two have a conversation that basically runs along the lines of Nick trying to convince Clyde not to kill everyone, and Clyde saying that<br />
"he will do what needs to be done"<br />
.<br />
This could go on for a few minutes, as it adds tention. It could - or perhaps SHOULD - be intercut with clips of the officers at City Hall pacing around the bomb, at a loss.<br />
The important part is that Clydes statements NOT be phrased any less vague, and that it ends with him saying something along the lines of;<br />
"This is too important, and it doesn't matter what deal you offer me this time, Nick."<br />
He dials a number on his phone, lets his finger hover over the call-button, looks long and hard at Nick and says;<br />
"What have I taught you?"<br />
Nick answers;<br />
"Never make deals with murderers."<br />
Nick exits the cell and close the first door, the bars, whith Clydes unflinching stare following him out.<br />
"Then this will not have been in vain."<br />
He says, and presses the call button.<br />
We hear the phone dial, we see Clyde close his eyes,  we see the phone screen in the City Hall Bomb come to life, we see Nicks hands grip the bars really tight, we see the City Hall phone screen flash the word<br />
'REDIRECTING CALL'<br />
, we see Clyde slowly drag another phone from his pocket, we see that he has wrapped the 'DADDY'-bracelet around it, we see him clutch it to his chest, we see the display on the new phone light up.and then a "picturesque" - but much smaller - explosion (similar to the one already in the movie).<br />
The point of the suicide is that Clyde had gone too far, and he MUST have known it.<br />
So - with him him being super clever - he also knew that the cops/lawyer would eventually find his tunnel, and that his time was soon to be up. Hence the huge, very real (but works excellent as scare tactics) bomb, and the subsequent, much smaller and more realistic-sized suicide bomb.<br />
It could also be implied, somehow, that had Nicks final answer been different Clyde might actually have blown up City Hall.<br />
I might take heat for this, but I kind of like the idea of Clyde ending his own life, and also the idea that Nick did NOT outsmart him, and that he had the upper hand all the way through to the very end.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248002/how-it-should-have-ended</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:36:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248002.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How it should have ended… on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>VanillaLimeCoke</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 11, 2016 05:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Another ending would have been Clyde detonating the bomb before returning to his cell. But he doesn't see city hall explode but hears it.<br />
Confused he sees the prison on fire and then says to himself, "well played. Well played" Clyde then disappears into the darkness.<br />
The mayor explodes at Rice and strips every single reward and rating from him. Nick then explodes at the mayor (I hated the mayor really btw) and resigns and adds that this ISN'T HER CITY IT IS THE PEOPLE'S. The mayor screams back defending herself but with harsh language. People hear this and she's not re elected. Rice after a week of soul and thought searching realizes he's <em>beep</em> up and got off easy. He starts spending as much time with his wife and daughter and after a month he mutters, "well done Clyde. Well done," finally realizing how much family means now that he's spent more time in a single month his family then he did in the last TEN YEARS COMBINED.<br />
Dunnington or Jonas or whoever was gunning for Nick's job gets it. But starts getting stressed and paranoid about it and obsessing they'll find Clyde.<br />
The final scene shows Clyde as some monk now fishing and living in the middle of nowhere with some other monks. As he goes into his hut, he takes off his clothes and it is revealed he has two tattoos. One is a picture of the wife/daughter that Darby saw and the other is a resketching of the DADDY bracelet.<br />
Clyde sort of has the look he too got off easy but is now over the whole killing spree but of course realizes he can never go back.<br />
Maybe a final shot of the two like TEN YEARS later shows them just passing each other somewhere shows. They then spin around and look at each other only now from afar and just ponder and then just continue walking with a look of "let bygones be bygones but if he comes back I'm going to destroy him"<br />
End credits roll as Mr. Tambourine Man plays an ultra extended version (like twice as long).<br />
Sorry I know this ending is crap but I just wanted a happy closure ending for both sides.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087974</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087974</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How it should have ended… on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>skay_baltimore</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 20, 2016 11:55 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Works better than the film's version, that's for sure.<br />
"Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier 'n puttin' it back in."  Will Rogers</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087973</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087973</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How it should have ended… on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087972</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087972</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How it should have ended… on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Xcalat3</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 02, 2016 03:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That would have been a Brilliant ending.<br />
Libera te tu temet ex inferis.<br />
pro ego sum diabolus, pro ego sum nex.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087971</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087971</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How it should have ended… on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Ohio9</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 16, 2016 09:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That would be a good ending, but I don't know if I'd like it better then the movie one.  I don't like the idea that Clyde can't be outstmarted.  That was one thing that kind of bugged me.  All of Clyde's plans kept working too perfectly.  Boring invincible heroes are a problem in movies, but sometimes boring invincible villains can be the same way.<br />
I actually liked Clyde getting a taste of his own medicine at the end.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087970</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087970</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How it should have ended… on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MinaGodiva</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 05, 2016 04:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Great ending!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087969</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087969</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How it should have ended… on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>stan-18673</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 05, 2015 05:07 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">An alternative ending could have been when Foxx brought Gerald in the first time,  if he'd said "okay, I was wrong to cut a deal 10 years ago, I admit I didn't feel good about it at the time, but you've had your fun and now it stops off you go and don't do it again!" then they go for a beer, shake hands,</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087968</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087968</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How it should have ended… on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dawnmuse79</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 29, 2015 10:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That would have been a totally EXCELLENT ending!  The screenwriter should have thought this one through!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087967</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087967</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How it should have ended… on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nickthestick22</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 26, 2015 08:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I like it</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087966</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2087966</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:11:20 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>