<![CDATA[sequel]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Thaw

jts102585 — 16 years ago(December 21, 2009 05:17 PM)

I actually enjoyed this movie. I think a sequel would be cool. Anyone else agree?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248150/sequelRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 20:53:37 GMTTue, 05 May 2026 16:29:07 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to sequel on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:18 GMT]]>Woodyanders — 7 months ago(September 02, 2025 12:35 AM)

A sequel with the contagion spreading all over the world would be seriously cool.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088774https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088774Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to sequel on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:17 GMT]]>flipper33 — 12 years ago(May 23, 2013 04:22 PM)

sequel to thaw set in a remote research station - you see where im going dont you, the pound shop to start my search right now.
she always did enjoy a good squeeze.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088773https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088773Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to sequel on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:15 GMT]]>aucarter — 14 years ago(January 18, 2012 09:36 PM)

The sequel would be interesting if it showed global epidemic occurring.
I can see it now
"The Thaw 2: Global Annihilation!"
"It will make you SQUIRM!"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088772https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088772Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to sequel on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:14 GMT]]>sirfunnyboy — 14 years ago(January 03, 2012 07:05 PM)

"You must be joking. It should be led outside and shot in the back of the can. This film is a textbook example of how not to make a film."
This was an good sci-fi film, I think it has "The Thing" kind of feel to it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088771https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088771Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to sequel on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:13 GMT]]>UltramanDeL — 14 years ago(December 22, 2011 08:37 AM)

Yeah! A sequel would be good. I enjoyed the movie because I scored big withda ladies ^__^ *nudge nudge *wink wink

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088770https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088770Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to sequel on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:12 GMT]]>timberwolf25 — 16 years ago(March 19, 2010 06:04 PM)

I agree as well. Would love to see a sequel.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088769https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088769Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to sequel on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:11 GMT]]>bogwart-1 — 16 years ago(March 06, 2010 05:46 AM)

You must be joking. It should be led outside and shot in the back of the can. This film is a textbook example of how not to make a film.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088768https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088768Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to sequel on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:09 GMT]]>Cm8000-1 — 16 years ago(January 26, 2010 11:37 PM)

Bring it!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088767https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088767Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to sequel on Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:08 GMT]]>lpotec — 16 years ago(January 17, 2010 06:51 PM)

I agree.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088766https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2088766Tue, 05 May 2026 16:29:08 GMT