<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[How come this movie has such a low score?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>rob_picken</strong> — <em>12 years ago(September 09, 2013 02:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I mean It was miles better than the last two which were complete garbage (Of course I think we can all agree that Curse Of The Black Pearl will always be the best one of the lot). I mean I've read how people weren't keen on it because there was no Will &amp; Elizabeth, which to be honest i think is better as I was sick of them both by number two anyway</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248570/how-come-this-movie-has-such-a-low-score</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 20:34:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/248570.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jaynekranc</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 05, 2017 11:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't know. People are just too nit picky maybe? I just watched it again and I like it more each time. I couldn't stand Will and Elizabeth by the end of the 3rd one. This one was certainly better than that one.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091999</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091999</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Joeyjag_97</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 13, 2016 06:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">A 6.7 is pretty high for this movie. I was expecting 6.3-6.4<br />
"A man chooses. A slave obeys."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091998</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091998</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kenneth_1857</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 08, 2016 03:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I would've given the movie a 5 if I were generous.<br />
A worn out concept with a bad story. 6.7 is ass-kissing former glory instead of looking at what you're presented with. A pile of dung that doesn't know where it wants to go.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091997</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091997</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Snamien</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 27, 2016 01:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">1 and fourth are best. They all got pretty fair ratings except this one which seems to be underrated. Anyway, we get a fifth!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091996</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091996</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>secretxmysteryx</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 05, 2014 02:55 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree completely<br />
It deserves so much more! It was SO MUCH BETTER than the third movie and I enjoyed it almost as equally as the first movie which is definitely the best!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091995</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091995</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>residentevil6901</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 24, 2014 02:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah I agree, my favorites are the 1st and 4th films, I did like the 2nd and 3rd but it kind of felt like the 2 Matrix sequels to me. They seemed confusing and crammed with so much going on it made me want a simple story. I also didn't like how the Will &amp; Elizabeth story turned out. I am looking forward to the 5th movie though</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091994</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091994</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>CrystalisK</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 22, 2014 04:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">because it was garbage compared to the others. This movie started ok but lost steam about 70-80 minutes in.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091993</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091993</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>knoxfan2008</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 09, 2014 06:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">6.7 is a pretty bad score. this film deserved a 7 easy</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091992</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091992</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>AGreenman19</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 01, 2014 09:27 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">6.7 is actually really high for an IMDb movie, bro.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091991</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091991</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How come this movie has such a low score? on Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>!!!deleted!!! (14789810)</strong> — <em>12 years ago(September 17, 2013 10:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">6.6 isn't that low.<br />
It beats the films Metacritic score anyway.<br />
Order of Cinema<br />
74</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091990</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/2091990</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:41:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>